W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: U+1822 - finalizing all variants

From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 01:13:54 +0200
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Message-ID: <56199BB2.7020503@bolorsoft.com>
Hi Greg,
F+FVS1 is not only occurred after the consonants with bow (bi. Gi. Hi. 
ki pi fi) but also may be used for every foreign words. Thus, we didn't 
find better way to combine it with FVS1. Of course, we added the calt 
rules for final 1822 after bi, pi, fi etc.
F+FVS2 is accusative form after consonants and first form of ja, je (bui 
za, bui ze). Currently, it is not distinguished in every font but in 
real life it's slightly different. BS just planned to add it by calt 
rules. But additionally, Mr. Jamyansuren has requested to add a final 
form, which is mostly used to write poems. It seems like stretched. I 
will send you it's picture, when I take it from Mr. Jamyansuren. If we 
reserve F+FVS2, that won't hurt or?

BTW: There is also one additional medial form of 1822, which is occurred 
in medieval scripts before consonant DA like final I. If we don't have 
free slots (FVSs), we can ignore it.

Badral

On 09.10.2015 15:22, Greg Eck wrote:
>
> Sorry, I missed one comment on Bolorsoft.
>
> There is one suggestion of a variant at F+FVS1 .
>
> As this is a variant used only in a ligature, I suggest that it does 
> not need an explicit FVS assignment. It will never appear in 
> isolation. And if we begin to consider all of the variant forms that 
> the ligatures bring in, there will be no end.
>
> There is also a suggested F+FVS2 that is very similar to the current 
> final.*Badral, could you comment further on this? I do not see a 
> distinction between the current Final and the suggested F+FVS2 as 
> listed in the comments on the Font Comparator site.*
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> *From:* Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
> *Sent:* Friday, October 9, 2015 9:12 PM
> *To:* public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
> *Subject:* U+1822 - finalizing all variants
>
> Let’s look at U+1822 together …
>
> It appears that we are all in general agreement here except possibly 
> on placement of the new medial variants.
>
> I will leave them as is unless there is further discussion here.
>
> Greg
>


-- 
Badral Sanlig, Software architect
www.bolorsoft.com  |www.badral.net
Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar
Received on Saturday, 10 October 2015 23:14:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:44 UTC