RE: U+1822 - finalizing all variants

Sorry, I missed one comment on Bolorsoft.
There is one suggestion of a variant at F+FVS1 [cid:image001.png@01D102D8.577238F0] .
As this is a variant used only in a ligature, I suggest that it does not need an explicit FVS assignment. It will never appear in isolation. And if we begin to consider all of the variant forms that the ligatures bring in, there will be no end.

There is also a suggested F+FVS2 that is very similar to the current final. Badral, could you comment further on this? I do not see a distinction between the current Final and the suggested F+FVS2 as listed in the comments on the Font Comparator site.

Thanks,
Greg


From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 9:12 PM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: U+1822 - finalizing all variants

Let's look at U+1822 together ...

It appears that we are all in general agreement here except possibly on placement of the new medial variants.
I will leave them as is unless there is further discussion here.

Greg

Received on Friday, 9 October 2015 13:23:29 UTC