W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > July to September 2015

RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

From: <jrmt@almas.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:51:14 +0900
To: "'Greg Eck'" <greck@postone.net>, <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003e01d0d09a$65df2c10$319d8430$@almas.co.jp>
Hi Greg,

 

Do you mean "we discuss the 6 variant FVS assignments first" is mean, we
discuss these 6 FVS assignment firstly ?

U1820-A

U1828-NA

U182C-QA

U182D-GA

U1835-JA

U1836-YA

 

Ok, Let us discuss these first. Can I write them all in separate thread ?

Let me input our team's comment on these 6 FVS assignment one by one after I
go to office today.

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================

 

 

 

 

From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] 
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 2:17 AM
To: jrmt@almas.co.jp; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: FW: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

 

Hi Jirimutu,

 

If we limit our comments to just the 6 FVS assignments, this is what I see .

 

.         You are in agreement with my suggestions for the suggestions being
put before the UTC as outlined in my reponse to Erdenchimeg.

.         As to the new variant at U+1820/U+1821-Final swept left with no
space - would it be something like the attached? This is the sequence <
U+180A >< U+180A ><U+1820> with no MVS included. Would this not do?

.         You have further discussion on U+182D - let's wait until we find
resolution on the 6 variant FVS assignments first.

.         You have further discussion on U+136 - let's wait until we find
resolution on the 6 variant FVS assignments first.

 

Greg

 

 

 

From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp] 
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 7:01 AM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

 

Hi Greg,

 

I have some inputs in the FVS assignment MisMatch documents.

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

 

Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================

 

 

 

From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

 

We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion. 

 

Let's go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS
assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make
the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings
at another position.

 

Greg
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2015 22:51:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:05 UTC