RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference

Great, thanks.

Satisfied.

RI


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@translate.com] 
> Sent: 11 September 2006 17:29
> To: 'Richard Ishida'
> Subject: Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference
> 
> Hello Richard, all
> 
> This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group.
> See 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep
/0018.html for our discussion.
> 
> Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement 
> it. Please have a look at:
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#i
> ntroduction
> 
> Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we 
> don't hear from you, we will assume this issue as closed.
> 
> Regards,
> -yves
> 
> 
> The original comments and discussion are here:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep
/0018.html
> > Subject: RE: missing doc ref
> > 
> > I think that we *should* mention it in the introductory text 
> > somewhere, since it is a document that people are familiar 
> with, and 
> > it ties together the ITS work with initiatives associated with that 
> > document, and shows that this is a practical outcome of 
> those ideas, 
> > which I believe is useful.
> > (Note, for example, that the DITA folks were working from that 
> > document, rather than from ITS stuff initially.)
> > 
> > (Which has set me also to thinking that maybe we should 
> refer to it in 
> > the ITS spec, too, for the same reasons - since very few people are 
> > likely to read the Requirements document once the spec is out.)
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 12:07:12 UTC