Thursday, 28 September 2006
- RE: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Existing ruby markup
- Re: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12
- Need to have language information data category as a feature at risk?
Wednesday, 27 September 2006
- [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-09-27
- RE: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12
- RE: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12
- RE: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11
Tuesday, 26 September 2006
- RE: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11
- RE: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11
- Re: AW: Features at risk
- RE: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- Re: AW: Features at risk
Monday, 25 September 2006
- AW: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11
- Rückruf: Re: AW: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11
- Re: AW: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11
- Re: AW: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12
- AW: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11
- Re: AW: Features at risk
- AW: Features at risk
- AW: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12
Sunday, 24 September 2006
Saturday, 23 September 2006
Sunday, 24 September 2006
- Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11
- On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12
Saturday, 23 September 2006
Friday, 22 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
Thursday, 21 September 2006
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- RE: [Fwd: [Bug 3323] Version of XPath: Write "XPath 1.0 or its successor"]
Wednesday, 20 September 2006
- RE: Question about reference to OpenDocument
- Re: Question about reference to OpenDocument
- Proposal for Ruby
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- Question about reference to OpenDocument
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Richard's editorial comments on ITS
- [Bug 2881] Change abstract
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
Monday, 18 September 2006
- ITS Teleconf - Wednesday Sep-20-2006 14:00 UTC
- [Bug 2808] Existing locInfo-like markup cannot be mapped using the locInfoSelector method
- [Bug 2719] Namespace requirement and selector values
- RE: On directionality and CSS
- RE: [Fwd: [Bug 3323] Version of XPath: Write "XPath 1.0 or its successor"]
- On directionality and CSS
- [Fwd: [Bug 3323] Version of XPath: Write "XPath 1.0 or its successor"]
Sunday, 17 September 2006
Friday, 15 September 2006
Thursday, 14 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- Global Rule for Ruby
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
Wednesday, 13 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- RE: lang ref and rfc4646
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference
- I18n Comments
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
Tuesday, 12 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- Xml:lang ref and rfc4646
Monday, 11 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look
- RE: todo: write mail about pointer attributes at the rubyRule element
- RE: todo: write mail about pointer attributes at the rubyRule element
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Mary's editorial comments on ITS
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Richard's editorial comments on ITS
- RE: issues list update
- issues list update
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] ITS markup must be integrated
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 dir
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 translate
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Spell out the attributes
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang missing
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 32 head
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] in the case of no selection
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] rubyText is an attribute
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use Japanese in Example 31
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 31 lacks rp
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default is ltr
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Refer to bidi article
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Some Hebrew quotation
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Is dir mandatory?
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Repetition
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] No implementation section
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Standardised wording
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Hard to know what this is about
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRef should allow for id strings
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRefPointer referant's data
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Pointing to terms
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Role of termInfo
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Marks terms and meanings
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Attribute used for locInfo
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 24
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Explanations for examples
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Examples 22 and 23
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Loc Info or Loc Note
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of elements
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Mention translation tools
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] 6.3 ed 1
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default translate value
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Inheritance of translation information
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Language information dc overview
Sunday, 10 September 2006
- Re: ITS version attribute
- Re: ITS version attribute
- Re: ITS version attribute
- Re: ITS version attribute
- Re: ITS version attribute
- ITS version attribute
- Re: Changes
Friday, 8 September 2006
- todo: write mail about pointer attributes at the rubyRule element
- Re: ITS Teleconf - Friday Sep-08-2006 15:00 UTC
- RE: Changes in the tagset draft
- Changes in the tagset draft
Thursday, 7 September 2006
Wednesday, 6 September 2006
Thursday, 31 August 2006
Wednesday, 30 August 2006
- Issues update
- Inheritance for terms
- [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-08-30
- RE: Term="yes|no"
- Re: Term="yes|no"
- RE: Term="yes|no"
- Re: Term="yes|no"
Tuesday, 29 August 2006
Wednesday, 23 August 2006
Tuesday, 22 August 2006
- RE: Missing term="yes|no" attribute for <termRule>
- AW: Missing term="yes|no" attribute for <termRule>
Monday, 21 August 2006
Wednesday, 16 August 2006
Tuesday, 15 August 2006
Friday, 11 August 2006
Wednesday, 9 August 2006
- Teleconference Minutes 2006-08-09
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3495 (action item from conf. call 09 August 2006)
Thursday, 3 August 2006
Tuesday, 1 August 2006
Monday, 31 July 2006
Saturday, 29 July 2006
Friday, 28 July 2006
- [ESW Wiki] Update of "its0503ReqWhoShouldRead" by RichardIshida
- [ESW Wiki] Update of "its0503ReqWhoShouldRead" by RichardIshida
- [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-28 (issues list updated)
- Re: ITS elements needing span or span-attributes
- Updated issues list
Thursday, 27 July 2006
Wednesday, 26 July 2006
- [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-26
- Issues Report
- RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri
- RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri
- Re: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri
- Re: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri
Tuesday, 25 July 2006
- RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri
- RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri
- Re: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri
- RE: [Bug 3290] Introduction too "positive" and not enough informative :)
- [Bug 3516] Editorial comments on ITS from i18n core
- [Bug 3515] xml:lang = language info, please
- [Bug 3514] Attributes missing?
- [Bug 3513] ITS markup must be integrated
- [Bug 3512] Example 14 dir
- [Bug 3511] Example 14 translate
- [Bug 3510] Spell out the attributes
- [Bug 3509] Too many places to look
- [Bug 3508] Example 32 head
- [Bug 3507] in the case of no selection
- [Bug 3506] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- [Bug 3505] Use Japanese in Example 31
- [Bug 3504] Example 31 lacks rp
- [Bug 3503] Refer to bidi article
- [Bug 3502] Example 30
- [Bug 3501] Some Hebrew quotation
- [Bug 3500] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- [Bug 3499] Is dir mandatory?
- [Bug 3498] Repetition
- [Bug 3493] Marks terms and meanings
- [Bug 3491] Explanations for examples
- [Bug 3490] Examples 22 and 23
- [Bug 3489] Mention translation tools
- [Bug 3488] 6.3 ed 1
- [Bug 3487] Invert translate examples
- [Bug 3482] Inheritance of translation information
- [Bug 3481] Translatability
- [Bug 3480] Use of xml:lang
- [Bug 3479] Example 33
- [Bug 3473] Language information data category overview
- [Bug 3469] Example 19 xml:lang
- [Bug 3469] Example 19 xml:lang
- Re: [Bug 3290] Introduction too "positive" and not enough informative :)
- [Fwd: [xml-dev] Localizable XML description of form]
Monday, 24 July 2006
- Examples and descriptions
- [Bug 3468] xml:lang missing
- [Bug 3480] Use of xml:lang
- [Bug 3473] Language information data category overview
- [Bug 3467] rubyText is an attribute
- [Bug 3466] Existing ruby markup
- [Bug 3465] Default is ltr
- [Bug 3464] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions
- [Bug 3463] termInfoRef should allow for id strings
- [Bug 3462] Pointing to terms
- [Bug 3461] Role of termInfo
- [Bug 3460] Loc Info or Loc Note
- [Bug 3459] Use of elements
- [Bug 3458] Default translate value
- [Bug 3457] RFC 3066bis
- [Bug 3497] No implementation section
- [Bug 3496] Standardised wording
- [Bug 3495] Hard to know what this is about
- [Bug 3494] termInfoRefPointer referant's data
- [Bug 3492] Example 24
- RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri
- [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-24
- Exploring the change from Ref to Uri
- [Bug 3492] Example 24
- [Bug 3495] Hard to know what this is about
- [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo
- [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo
- [Bug 3409] Inconsistent use of single- and double-quotes
- [Bug 3408] The attribute name "translate" may be confusing
- [Bug 3362] method for translatability of attributes not clear
- [Bug 3361] No defined behavior if external rules can't be accessed
- [Bug 3360] Following the inheritance of the rules can be difficult
- [Bug 3331] Please use XHTML Modularization for defining ITS DTD and Schema
- [Bug 3330] lro and rlo explanation
- [Bug 3329] Reference to its:span
- [Bug 3328] Order of precedence in selection
- [Bug 3323] Version of XPath: Write "XPath 1.0 or its successor"
- [Bug 3321] Relation of terminology data category to existing standards for terminology
- [Bug 3320] Using IDs for nodes instead of / in addition to XPath
- RE: Proposal for xml:lang
- [Bug 3319] Namespace binding mechanism
- [Bug 3318] Clarify "within text" data category
- [Bug 3495] Hard to know what this is about
- [Bug 3317] Linking of versions of textual segments via "localization information" data category
- ITS elements needing span or span-attributes
- [Bug 3297] Extensibility and its namespace
- [Bug 3295] What kind of document
- [Bug 3293] Conformance/Compliance
- [Bug 3292] XHTML Module for XHTML 1.1 or XHTML 2.0
- [Bug 3291] Selector attribute and XSLT
- [Bug 3290] Introduction too "positive" and not enough informative :)
- [Bug 3126] Attaching information to the object associated to a selected node
- [Bug 3296] General comment
- [Bug 3294] Conformance section
- [Bug 3287] Clarity of language in the abstract
- [Bug 3068] Metadata for rules necessary
- [Bug 3062] Need to write examples in the spec as valid XML
- [Bug 3058] ITS inheritance mechanism versus other inheritance mechanisms (e.g. DITA): Need for clear distinction
- [Bug 3057] Proposal for grouping rules
- [Bug 3050] Linking mechanism
- [Bug 3039] Proposal: check constraints in global rules
- [Bug 3017] rename documentRules and documentRule
- [Bug 3016] ITS schema structure redesign
- [Bug 3010] RELAX NG schema should use common prefix for patterns
- [Bug 3007] Terminology: "data category"
- [Bug 3005] Relation of rules for translatable attributes versus non-translatable elements
- [Bug 3004] Work on modularizations
- [Bug 3000] Allowing extensibility in its:documentRules
- [Bug 2969] Terminology
- [Bug 2951] The Section "Basic concepts" needs to be reviewed
- [Bug 2935] processing expectations for ruby / directionality
- [Bug 2926] RELAX NG schemas can de ambiguous
- [Bug 2924] Why a closed list of schema languages?
- [Bug 2923] Possible conflicts between schemas and instances
- [Bug 2922] The word "tag" is not appropriate
- [Bug 2915] Clarify relationship between host vocabulary markup data cats and ITS data cats
- [Bug 2890] Terminology: local versus global not used much in the draft
- [Bug 2883] Reword reference to "Localization Properties" in "Out-of-scope" section
- [Bug 2882] Reword "Motivation for ITS"
- [Bug 2881] Change abstract
- Proposal for xml:lang
- About ruby in ITS global usage
- [Bug 3287] Clarity of language in the abstract
Friday, 21 July 2006
- Example 25
- [Bug 2879] Ruby data category
- [Bug 2878] "Element within text" data category
- [Bug 2877] Terminology data category
- [Bug 2876] Need to address versioning
- [Bug 2761] "Products which ITS will encompass"
- [Bug 2808] Existing locInfo-like markup cannot be mapped using the locInfoSelector method
- [Bug 2719] Namespace requirement and selector values
- [Bug 2621] On conformance levels: Have a simple conformance: in situ, with default selectors
- [Bug 2620] Necessity of dislocated scope / selectors *and* insitu scope / selectors
- [Bug 2619] Complexity of precedence rules for "scope" (or "selectors")
- [Bug 2618] Proposal for a "translateAddinfo" attribute
- [Bug 2558] entry point for schemas
- [Bug 2557] namespace of attributes
- [Bug 2556] syntax errors in markup
- [Bug 3287] Clarity of language in the abstract
- [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-21
- Re: LC comments - current state
- RE: DITA Translation Subcommittee Meeting Minutes: 17 July 2006
- Re: LC comments - current state
- Re: DITA Translation Subcommittee Meeting Minutes: 17 July 2006
- LC comments - current state
Thursday, 20 July 2006
Wednesday, 19 July 2006
- [Bug 3515] xml:lang = language info, please
- [Bug 3515] Attributes missing?xml:lang = language info, please
- [Bug 3514] Attributes missing?
- [Bug 3513] ITS markup must be integrated
- [Bug 3512] Example 14 dir
- [Bug 3511] Example 14 translate
- [Bug 3510] Spell out the attributes
- [Bug 3509] Too many places to look
- [Bug 3508] Example 32 head
- [Bug 3507] in the case of no selection
- [Bug 3506] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- [Bug 3505] Use Japanese in Example 31
- [Bug 3504] Example 31 lacks rp
- [Bug 3503] Refer to bidi article
- [Bug 3502] Example 30
- [Bug 3501] Some Hebrew quotation
- [Bug 3502] Example 30
- [Bug 3500] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- [Bug 3499] Is dir mandatory?
- [Bug 3498] Repetition
- [Bug 3497] No implementation section
- [Bug 3496] Standardised wording
- [Bug 3495] Hard to know what this is about
- [Bug 3494] termInfoRefPointer referant's data
- [Bug 3493] Marks terms and meanings
- [Bug 3492] Example 24
- [Bug 3491] Explanations for examples
- [Bug 3490] Examples 22 and 23
- [Bug 3489] Mention translation tools
- [Bug 3488] 6.3 ed 1
- [Bug 3487] Invert translate examples
- [Bug 3464] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions
- [Bug 3463] termInfoRef should allow for id strings
- [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-19
- Re: Reply to last call comment on "Internationalization Tag Set"
- [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo
- Re: Reply to last call comment on "Internationalization Tag Set"
Tuesday, 18 July 2006
- [Bug 3482] Inheritance of translation information
- [Bug 3481] Translatability
- [Bug 3480] Use of xml:lang
- [Bug 3479] Example 33
Monday, 17 July 2006
- [Bug 3473] Language information data category overview
- [Bug 3473] Language information data category overview
- [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-17
- [Bug 3469] Example 19 xml:lang
- [Bug 3362] method for translatability of attributes not clear
- [Bug 3329] Reference to its:span
- [Bug 3328] Order of precedence in selection
Friday, 14 July 2006
- [Bug 3465] Default is ltr
- [Bug 3464] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions
- [Bug 3469] Example 19 xml:lang
- [Bug 3468] xml:lang missing
- [Bug 3467] rubyText is an attribute
- [Bug 3466] Existing ruby markup
- [Bug 3463] termInfoRef should allow for id strings
- [Bug 3462] Pointing to terms
- [Bug 3461] Role of termInfo
- [Bug 3460] Loc Info or Loc Note
- [Bug 3459] Use of elements
- [Bug 3458] Default translate value
- [Bug 3457] RFC 3066bis
- [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo
- [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo
Thursday, 13 July 2006
- [Bug 3408] The attribute name "translate" may be confusing
- [Bug 3409] Inconsistent use of single- and double-quotes
- [Bug 3331] Please use XHTML Modularization for defining ITS DTD and Schema
- [Bug 3297] Extensibility and its namespace
- [Bug 3295] What kind of document
- [Bug 3293] Conformance/Compliance
- [Bug 3291] Selector attribute and XSLT
- [Bug 3287] Clarity of language in the abstract
Wednesday, 12 July 2006
- Re: Behavior for ITS elements in document instances
- Re: Behavior for ITS elements in document instances
- [Bug 3319] Namespace binding mechanism
- Re: Proposed title change for the best practices document
- RE: Proposed title change for the best practices document
- Re: Proposed title change for the best practices document
Tuesday, 11 July 2006
- Proposal to include reference to " Requirements for Localizable DTD Design"
- Re: Behavior for ITS elements in document instances
Monday, 10 July 2006
Sunday, 9 July 2006
Saturday, 8 July 2006
- [Bug 3318] Clarify "within text" data category
- [Bug 3362] method for translatability of attributes not clear
- [Bug 3360] Following the inheritance of the rules can be difficult
- [Bug 3361] No defined behavior if external rules can't be accessed
- [Bug 3362] method for translatability of attributes not clear
- [Bug 3318] Clarify "within text" data category
Friday, 7 July 2006
Thursday, 6 July 2006
- RE: Proposed title change for the best practices document
- RE: Proposed title change for the best practices document
- Re: Proposed title change for the best practices document
Wednesday, 5 July 2006
- Fixing example 24
- Proposed title change for the best practices document
- [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-05