- From: Jörg Schütz <joerg@bioloom.de>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:13:27 +0100
- To: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
Hi Yves, What about using the annotatorsRef/its-annotators-ref attribute for this purpose, i.e. to provide additional information as foreseen in the MT Confidence specification? Cheers -- Jörg On Mar 22, 2014 at 14:53 (CET), Yves Savourel wrote: >> ...and there is no way to even declare qualityMatch as the >> holder for the mtConfidence value because there is no mtConfidenceRef >> attribute on the mtConfidenceRule element. > > Correction: I meant mtConfidencePointer not mtConfidenceRef > > -ys >
Received on Saturday, 22 March 2014 16:13:45 UTC