RE: MT Confidence mapping to XLIFF 2

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 07:53:31 -0600
To: <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00b001cf45d6$1c7b8a50$55729ef0$@com>

> ...and there is no way to even declare qualityMatch as the 
> holder for the mtConfidence value because there is no mtConfidenceRef 
> attribute on the mtConfidenceRule element.

Correction: I meant mtConfidencePointer not mtConfidenceRef

-ys

Received on Saturday, 22 March 2014 13:53:59 UTC