Re: [xliff] ITS module section(s) in the specification

Am 04.12.2014 um 10:56 schrieb Dr. David Filip <David.Filip@ul.ie>:

> Thanks Felix,
> I agree let's discuss on 8th on the IG call, but of course let's keep the discussion available to the TC.
> 
> 
> Looking at Yves’ mockup, there seem to be many parts that would not be understood by a generic ITS processors, like:
> 
> „	• The id attribute is REQUIRED.“ (for terminology)
> 
> „If the annotation has an itsm:termConfidence attribute, it must be within the scope of an itsm:annotatorsRef with the terminology annotator set.“ . Scope here seems to be the unit, not the whole XML file (which it would be for a generic ITS processor).
> 
> This (and other normative stuff) is (or is going to be)  not only in Yves mock up but also in the current Working Draft.
> I believe that there is no dissent about the actual technical solution.
> I think this is just a debate about layout within the 2.1 spec, which is premature IMHO as I keep saying.. 

Well, then we need more time to make it mature, no? I understand the timing of the XLIFF 2.1 specification. But if the layout of the feature in the spec is premature, then shouldn’t we rather take more time?

Best,

Felix