Re: [xliff] ITS module section(s) in the specification

Thanks Felix,
I agree let's discuss on 8th on the IG call, but of course let's keep the
discussion available to the TC.


> Looking at Yves’ mockup, there seem to be many parts that would not be
> understood by a generic ITS processors, like:
>
> „ • The id attribute is REQUIRED.“ (for terminology)
>
> „If the annotation has an itsm:termConfidence attribute, it must be within
> the scope of an itsm:annotatorsRef with the terminology annotator set.“ .
> Scope here seems to be the unit, not the whole XML file (which it would be
> for a generic ITS processor).
>

This (and other normative stuff) is (or is going to be)  not only in Yves
mock up but also in the current Working Draft.
I believe that there is no dissent about the actual technical solution.
I think this is just a debate about layout within the 2.1 spec, which is
premature IMHO as I keep saying..
I also said that the mockup has a big overlap with the actual working
draft..