Re: XLIFF Mapping - status

> There is still one sub-section (Preserve Space for 
> inline elements) to write.
> It should be easy and I'll try to do it tomorrow.

It's done.

I've also removed the issues for which we had consensus or that were dropped.
This leaves us with:

--1) How to map back termInfoRef when you go from XLIFF to the original format.

--2) How to map back locNoteRef when you go from XLIFF to the original format.

--4) There is no way to use <mrk> across segments. 
I think Arle run into this issue with another project. The question is: do we
want to recommend a mechanism, or let tools do whatever they feel like?

--6) Do we want to provide a set of ITS rules to process an XLIFF document with a pure ITS processor?
Technically that is what we are trying to achieve with the ITS+ITSXLIFF namespaces. We have a start of that here:
http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_1.2_Mapping#ITS_Rules_to_Process_an_XLIFF_1.2_Document. But I'm not sure if it's
needed. It'd be certainly nice to have.

Cheers,
-ys

Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 06:10:51 UTC