- From: Camille Bégnis <camille@neodoc.biz>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:53:04 +0100
- To: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <49074370.8040200@neodoc.biz>
Hi, just sending the attachments so others can test the docbook decoration. Camille. Camille Bégnis wrote: > Hello, > > I have finally been tested the decorator batch archive, and it looks to > work fine with the provided example. > > I have a question though: as a result the initial file is added the > itstve and itstva attributes which makes that result to not respect the > initial schema. I guess this is fine if we just want to extract the > strings afterwards, but why not adding those in a specific namespace? > > I have then tested the decorator on a simple DocBook document with the > rules available at > http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-i18n-bp/#relating-docbook-plus-its > > by running: > > ./run-saxon.sh DocBookSample.xml ex-relating-docbook-plus-its-1.xml > > It works fine but the <command> tag is set as translatable while it > isn't. As a matter of fact the resulting rules.xml is empty. What did I > miss? > > I attach the files to this email. > > Then a final question: what is the next step after one has the decorated > file? > > Camille. > > P.S.1: The link at the bottom of > http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/ITS_Translate_Decorator links > to xsltproc instead of saxon > > P.S.2: the root element of example/external.xml should not be <rules> ? >
Attachments
- text/xml attachment: DocBookSample.xml
- text/xml attachment: ex-relating-docbook-plus-its-1.xml
- text/xml attachment: its-decorated2.xml
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:53:41 UTC