W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org > October 2008

decorator tests

From: Camille Bégnis <camille@neodoc.biz>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:26:39 +0100
Message-ID: <4905C18F.2010907@neodoc.biz>
To: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
Hello,

I have finally been tested the decorator batch archive, and it looks to
work fine with the provided example.

I have a question though: as a result the initial file is added the
itstve and itstva attributes which makes that result to not respect the
initial schema. I guess this is fine if we just want to extract the
strings afterwards, but why not adding those in a specific namespace?

I have then tested the decorator on a simple DocBook document with the
rules available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-i18n-bp/#relating-docbook-plus-its

by running:

./run-saxon.sh DocBookSample.xml ex-relating-docbook-plus-its-1.xml

It works fine but the <command> tag is set as translatable while it
isn't. As a matter of fact the resulting rules.xml is empty. What did I
miss?

I attach the files to this email.

Then a final question: what is the next step after one has the decorated
file?

Camille.

P.S.1: The link at the bottom of
http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/ITS_Translate_Decorator links
to xsltproc instead of saxon

P.S.2: the root element of example/external.xml should not be <rules> ?

Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 13:27:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:11:27 UTC