- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 23:50:50 +0100
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Richard, Chairs and working group, in light of this an other information, I withdraw my CP for the inclusion of the <rb> element. Leif Halvard Silli Richard Ishida, Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:15:36 +0000: > The Internationalization Working Group is aware that the call for Change > Proposals for Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" [1] will > close on 11th February. > > Discussions have been taking place about how best to move forward with > regards to ruby in html5, but more time is needed to finalize those > discussions so that a widely acceptable recommendation can be made as to > how to proceed. > > The Internationalization Working Group will therefore not formally > pursue the issue further at this time. In particular, the > Internationalization Working Group will not submit or endorse any > change proposal for issue-172 at this time, and asks that other > interested parties consider not pursuing this issue further at this > time, so that this issue can be closed without prejudice for now and > re-opened later if necessary. > > The Internationalization Working Group absolutely remains committed > to working further, together with vendor representatives and other > interested parties, to get agreement about out how <ruby>, including > <rb>, should be implemented, and is taking steps to move that forward. > > > -- > Richard Ishida > Internationalization Activity Lead > W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) > > http://www.w3.org/International/ > http://rishida.net/
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 22:51:22 UTC