- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:17:35 +0100
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
On 02/09/2012 11:15 PM, Richard Ishida wrote: > The Internationalization Working Group is aware that the call for Change > Proposals for Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" [1] will > close on 11th February. > > Discussions have been taking place about how best to move forward with > regards to ruby in html5, but more time is needed to finalize those > discussions so that a widely acceptable recommendation can be made as to > how to proceed. > > The Internationalization Working Group will therefore not formally pursue the issue further at this time. In particular, the > Internationalization Working Group will not submit or endorse any change proposal for issue-172 at this time, and asks that > other interested parties consider not pursuing this issue further at this time, so that this issue can be closed without > prejudice for now and re-opened later if necessary. > > The Internationalization Working Group absolutely remains committed to working further, together with vendor representatives > and other interested parties, to get agreement about out how <ruby>, including <rb>, should be implemented, and is taking > steps to move that forward. I think it's nonetheless important to address https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13113 which requests changes in the parsing algorithm to not preclude the ability to parse more complex ruby markup in the future. ~fantasai
Received on Sunday, 12 February 2012 00:18:04 UTC