- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:09:02 -0800
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, "'Leif Halvard Silli'" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, "'Michael (tm) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>
On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Richard Ishida wrote: > Hi Roy, > >> Where is the word "pragma" coming from? > > I'm using pragma purely because that's how Ian refered to these things in > HTML5, and I thought I ought to be consistent with that. See for example, > section 4.2.5.3, which is called "Pragma directives". > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html#p > ragma-directives Well, that figures. All the web terminology is used incorrectly, so I suppose it is consistent to use compiler terminology incorrectly as well. >> My concern for HTML5 is that the orthogonality of http-equiv be preserved. >> I suggest you take the lead on the changes regarding language default and >> I'll construct a change that makes it clear what http-equiv means and why. > > Sure, but just so that I'm clear, you mean to add wording about that in the > same change proposal, right ? Yes. > Shall I give you write access to the i18n wiki ? I think you can just add it to the change proposal when I post it to the list -- it won't conflict with your changes. ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2010 20:09:35 UTC