Re: Proposal to make Content-Language pragma non-conforming altogether for ISSUE-88 (mark I) from Julian Reschke on 2010-04-29 (public-i18n-core@w3.org from April to June 2010)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:34:38 +0200
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4BD9449E.4010403@gmx.de>

On 29.04.2010 10:26, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> ...
> To be clear: are you saying you object to the I18N WG's preferred
> resolution? If so, we will likely take this issue to a survey.
> ...

Yes. It's not the HTML spec's job to restrict the contents of what can 
go into meta/@http-equiv; in particular to make it's use non-conforming.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:35:27 UTC