- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:26:17 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On Apr 29, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 29.04.2010 00:12, Phillips, Addison wrote: >> On 9 April 2010, Ian Hickson proposed [1] a solution to Issue-88 >> that said in part: >> >> -- >> SUMMARY >> People are confused by the Content-Language pragma, so it should be >> made >> non-conforming. >> -- >> >> The Internationalization Core WG has officially endorsed this >> proposed solution [2]. Existing, legacy documents (and non-browser >> processes that use this markup) will not be harmed by this solution >> while this will eliminate the confusing (and not useful) overlap in >> language declaration. >> >> (for I18N Core), >> >> Addison >> ... > > Again: the syntax inside meta/http-equiv is defined by the > definitions of the HTTP headers; not HTML. This is a layer violation. > > Add discussions for client-side handling of specific values if you > want, but don't break this feature. To be clear: are you saying you object to the I18N WG's preferred resolution? If so, we will likely take this issue to a survey. Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:26:51 UTC