- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 10:42:32 +0900
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Hi David, all, On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 18:37:56 +0900, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Saturday 2006-01-21 10:37 +0000, ishida@w3.org wrote: >> Comment 6 >> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/ > >> In 6.1.1, it should be made clear that the styling language (e.g. CSS) >> must provide a prefix binding mechanism. It is also unclear what >> effect, if any, namespace declarations in the document being styled >> have on prefixes used in the stylesheet. > > I agree that the selectors draft should say more than it does about this > point. I propose the following: > > 1. We add a new section with the following text (or restructure section > 11 a little to accomodate it): > > The language using selectors should define what namespace prefixes > are <dfn>declared</dfn> when processing a selector. If it does > not, then no prefixes are declared. > > (I chose "should" over "may", but I don't feel strongly about it.) > > 2. [Optionally] We hyperlink the relevant occurences of declare(d) in > 6.1.1, 6.2, 6.2.1, 6.3.3, 11, and 13 to this definition. > > 3. We remove the thrice-repeated text: > > The mechanism for declaring a namespace prefix is left up to the > language implementing Selectors. In CSS, such a mechanism is > defined in the General Syntax module. > > which seems to have been a concern in i18n's comment 3. > > Would this satisfy your concerns? > > -David > If this is the resolution of the css working group, the i18n core working group will be satisfied with it. Thank you very much. Regards, Felix.
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2006 01:42:42 UTC