- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:37:56 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20060204093756.GB4588@ridley.dbaron.org>
On Saturday 2006-01-21 10:37 +0000, ishida@w3.org wrote:
> Comment 6
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/
> In 6.1.1, it should be made clear that the styling language (e.g. CSS)
> must provide a prefix binding mechanism. It is also unclear what
> effect, if any, namespace declarations in the document being styled
> have on prefixes used in the stylesheet.
I agree that the selectors draft should say more than it does about this
point. I propose the following:
1. We add a new section with the following text (or restructure section
11 a little to accomodate it):
The language using selectors should define what namespace prefixes
are <dfn>declared</dfn> when processing a selector. If it does
not, then no prefixes are declared.
(I chose "should" over "may", but I don't feel strongly about it.)
2. [Optionally] We hyperlink the relevant occurences of declare(d) in
6.1.1, 6.2, 6.2.1, 6.3.3, 11, and 13 to this definition.
3. We remove the thrice-repeated text:
The mechanism for declaring a namespace prefix is left up to the
language implementing Selectors. In CSS, such a mechanism is
defined in the General Syntax module.
which seems to have been a concern in i18n's comment 3.
Would this satisfy your concerns?
-David
--
L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2006 20:25:16 UTC