- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 10:47:01 +0900
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Hi Iah, all, On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:02:30 +0900, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 ishida@w3.org wrote: >> >> Comment: Please add a link to the Syntax document, and make it a >> dependency. > > This is an official comment on behalf of the CSS working group. > > I do not understand your request. As Bjoern wrote: > >> > In #23, what do you mean by making the syntax module a >> > dependency? It is perfectly reasonable to use CSS Selectors >> > without other parts of the CSS syntax, e.g. as selection >> > mechanism in an API, and the draft refers to the module only >> > to point out that that module defines a namespace prefix >> > binding mechanism. > > > On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Felix Sasaki wrote: >> >> see my reply to a mail from Daniel about the unclearness of dependency >> of this draft on CSS. > > We do not understand why it seems unclear. > > > I have made no change to the spec in response to this comment. In the > likely event that this does not satisfy your request, please explain > exactly what it is you would like to see, with your reasoning. > > Cheers, We discussed your reply and decided to accept your resolution. Thank you. Regards, Felix.
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2006 01:47:15 UTC