- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:51:10 +0200
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Le jeudi 04 mai 2006 à 15:22 +0100, Richard Ishida a écrit : > The current text, however, doesn't particularly encourage content authors to > use UTF-8. On the contrary, since it talks about using the value of the > Accept-Charset header and is noncommittal about which encoding is being > indicated using the Content-Type header and what determines the choice of > encoding, it makes no clear recommendation to use utf-8. As discussed with you in a separate thread, the BPWG has agreed to amend the text under the Character Encoding section to clarify why using Unicode is good choice: "Encoding of the content to a desired character encoding is dependent on the authoring tools being used, Web server configuration and the server side scripting technology being used (if any). For a discussion of this see [CHARSET1] and [CHARSET2]. Unicode is a good choice for representing content when served in multiple languages. The amount of bandwidth required to transmit content can vary significantly depending on the character encoding used. Text consisting principally of characters from the Latin alphabet will encode more efficiently in UTF-8, whereas text consisting principally of characters from ideographic scripts will encode more efficiently in UTF-16. When choosing a character encoding, consider the efficiency of the available encodings. Since the Default Delivery Context specifies use only of UTF-8, all applications should support UTF-8. " http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060518/#CHARACTER_ENCODING_USE As this came as a result of a discussion with you, we assume that you are now satisfied with this resolution. Dom
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2006 15:51:22 UTC