Re: [charmod-norm] Limitations of Normalization - Confusion

@klensin I addressed your correction. I also attempted to address your comment by reducing (but not eliminating) the use of "confusable" as a term. I don't have a problem with saying "confusable" as a term per se, but I think you're right that referring to the appearance is what's important. 

I do make brief mention of the other "rather extreme cases" as:

> Other familiar if somewhat less "identical-looking" spoofs such as l vs. 1 or O and 0.

The point here is that things that look alike might not match each other and I think we've covered that :-)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aphillips
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/88#issuecomment-299664769 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 6 May 2017 20:45:58 UTC