- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:53:43 -0800
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org PF" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, www-dom@w3.org, public-hypertext-cg@w3.org
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:18 AM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > Ah, I understand your argument now. > > … > > In any case, I don't think mutation events is the path forward here. > We at mozilla want to phase them out due to the various problems that > they have, and my guess is that microsoft won't implement them for the > same reason. This won't change no matter what the spec says. > > Agreed. My request was to retain DOMAttrModified or provide a suitable > replacement. I don't have any particular attachment to the current mutation > event model, as long as there is a long term goal to provide a standardized > method for author notification when a specific attribute changes. There definitely is. / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 19:54:44 UTC