- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:02:46 -0600
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: David Bolter <david.bolter@gmail.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-hypertext-cg@w3.org" <public-hypertext-cg@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>, "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org PF" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, w3c-wai-pf-request@w3.org, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF321AA81F.81C28E1F-ON862576CA.00830426-862576CB.00004126@us.ibm.com>
James, I know you know this but for the rest - this change will break more than just screen readers. It will break magnifiers, alternate input devices, etc., and accessibility test tools across all the platforms. We need to consider a deprecation runway to get these applications to adapt. These applications just don't sit there and poll the browser. Essentially, if we are not careful we will put the whole ecosystem casters up. If this is being planned we should look at the typical development release cycles for the major ATVs. and time it properly. What I would do is state that an event is being deprecated and give ATVs a runway to switch over before turning off the old event model. Like anything else, the ATs will still be left with the baggage of supporting the old browsers. For example, they are still saddled with IE6 support as many customers have no reason to switch. We should also consider doing the unthinkable and tell the ATVs the browser release time frame for this change. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist James Craig <jcraig@apple.com > To Sent by: Sean Hogan w3c-wai-pf-reques <shogun70@westnet.com.au> t@w3.org cc David Bolter <david.bolter@gmail.com>, Jonas 02/09/2010 07:20 Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Doug PM Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org PF" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-hypertext-cg@w3.org" <public-hypertext-cg@w3.org> Subject Re: Deprecation of DOMAttrModified (Was: DOMActivate vs. Activation Behavior) On Feb 9, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Sean Hogan wrote: On 10/02/10 8:37 AM, James Craig wrote: On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:03 PM, David Bolter wrote: That said, I'm not sure if this pattern is used a lot today. As far as I'm aware, it's not used at all today, because there isn't a way to implement it. Currently IE has onpropertychange and Firefox / Opera have DOMAttrModified. Aren't they sufficient? Even if DOMAttrModified wasn't threatened with deprecation and was implemented consistently across all major browsers, it would still require additional implementation on the part of a screen reader, but no screen reader dev team is going to waste time implementing a feature at relies on a deprecated event model.
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic32672.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 00:03:40 UTC