On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > Ah, I understand your argument now. … > > In any case, I don't think mutation events is the path forward here. > We at mozilla want to phase them out due to the various problems that > they have, and my guess is that microsoft won't implement them for the > same reason. This won't change no matter what the spec says. Agreed. My request was to retain DOMAttrModified or provide a suitable replacement. I don't have any particular attachment to the current mutation event model, as long as there is a long term goal to provide a standardized method for author notification when a specific attribute changes. James
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 18:19:10 UTC