Re: Call for consensus on defining IRI template expansion (ISSUE-30)

> I feel like these decisions are a little bit out of scope for Hydra itself.

As a client, I need to know how to use the URI template
before I can make an API request. Seems necessarily in scope to me.

> Is there no such proposal elsewhere?

I haven't seen any, no.

> The value could then simply be a turtle-formatted RDF object. Even with
> the angle brackets to be consistent.

And also with escaping?

> Though I would not allow prefixed URIs.

Would be difficult indeed if no prefixes are agreed upon
(and it's probably better not to).

> However your initial question was more about how Hydra should define
> what is the parameter and not how to put it there. I think this should
> be the focus.

Both are needed for a client to work.

Ruben

Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 08:29:41 UTC