W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Reconsidering template mappings

From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:32:15 +0200
Cc: "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9894445D-D62A-4850-A331-C3D237AE68DD@ugent.be>
To: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>
Hi Tomasz,

>  But what does it mean that it maps a variable to a
> property? Andreas wrote on GitHub "My view: The IRI of the foaf:maker
> is the value which should be passed.". So there is a property
> foaf:maker and it's value will be passed as the parameter. But
> property of what subject?

We had a long discussion about exactly that in the context of #30:

>> The thing here is that the subject of the triple is not defined yet.

>> Basically, we have the choice between:
>> a) the subjects are the elements of the collection ("Actor")
>> b) the subjects are "related" to the elements of the collection ("Movie starring actor")
>> Clearly, a) is most strictly defined;
>> and b) is so loosely defined that we basically cannot infer anything.



Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 08:32:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:53:59 UTC