- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:58:47 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 3 Jul 2014 at 20:57, McBennett, Pat wrote: > Ruben Verborgh wrote on July 03, 2014 6:50 PM: >>> </alice> hydra:collection </alice/friends> . >>> </alice/friends> a hydra:Collection ; >>> hydra:manages </alice/friends/meta> . >>> </alice/friends/meta> hydra:property schema:knows ; >>> hydra:subject </alice> >> >> Note that this is related to the TODO that I propose, i.e., to define what the >> object of manages is, sticking a name to it. > > Yep, it sure is - in fact I'd say it's exactly the same concern, > i.e. the 'blank node-ness' of 'hydra:manages'. I want to avoid blank > nodes (where possible), and you want to know its domain and future > evolution. Are you sure you are talking about the same thing? As far as I understood it, Ruben wants to have - a name for the "manages block", i.e., the range of hydra:manage - the domain of hydra:manage (not 100% if that was a typo or not) You said you wanted to identify "manages blocks" with an IRI and establishing a best practice of how those IRIs should look like (collection IRI + /meta) -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 20:59:15 UTC