Asbjørn Ulsberg via GitHub
elf Pavlik via GitHub
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Monday, 30 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Sunday, 29 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Sunday, 29 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Sunday, 29 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Saturday, 28 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Saturday, 28 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Recommend to use cache revalidation (Saturday, 28 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Saturday, 28 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Saturday, 28 October)
- [Specifications] collections with manages block & Triple Pattern Fragments (Wednesday, 25 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Saturday, 21 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity? (Saturday, 21 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Saturday, 21 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Monday, 16 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity? (Sunday, 15 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Explicitly mention namespace in Core Vocabulary document (Sunday, 15 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Saturday, 14 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity? (Saturday, 14 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Recommend to use cache revalidation (Saturday, 14 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity? (Friday, 13 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Friday, 13 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Thursday, 12 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Thursday, 12 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Thursday, 5 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Wednesday, 4 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources (Wednesday, 4 October)
- Closed: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources (Wednesday, 4 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Wednesday, 4 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Monday, 2 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources (Monday, 2 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources (Monday, 2 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 1 October)
- [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 1 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 1 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 1 October)
Karol Szczepański via GitHub
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Monday, 30 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Saturday, 14 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity? (Saturday, 14 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity? (Saturday, 14 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Thursday, 12 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Thursday, 5 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources (Wednesday, 4 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Wednesday, 4 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Tuesday, 3 October)
Markus Lanthaler via GitHub
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Tuesday, 31 October)
- [Specifications] POST/PUT requests in use cases shouldn't use relative URLs to reference the context (Tuesday, 31 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Recommend to use cache revalidation (Sunday, 29 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Sunday, 29 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Sunday, 29 October)
- [Specifications] new commits pushed by lanthaler (Monday, 16 October)
- [Specifications] new commits pushed by lanthaler (Monday, 16 October)
- [Specifications] Merged Pull Request: Explicitly mention namespace in Core Vocabulary document (Monday, 16 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Explicitly mention namespace in Core Vocabulary document (Monday, 16 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 15 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Wednesday, 4 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 1 October)
Ruben Verborgh via GitHub
Tomasz Pluskiewicz via GitHub
- Re: [Specifications] POST/PUT requests in use cases shouldn't use relative URLs to reference the context (Tuesday, 31 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Tuesday, 31 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Introduce something like hydra:memberTemplate (Tuesday, 31 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Monday, 30 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Monday, 30 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Monday, 30 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Sunday, 29 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Sunday, 29 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Saturday, 28 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Saturday, 28 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Saturday, 28 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Saturday, 28 October)
- [Specifications] Pull Request: Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT) (Saturday, 28 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity? (Saturday, 21 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Friday, 20 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Friday, 20 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Monday, 16 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Monday, 16 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Monday, 16 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity? (Saturday, 14 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity? (Saturday, 14 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Thursday, 12 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 8 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Monday, 2 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 1 October)
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members (Sunday, 1 October)
Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2017 13:00:49 UTC