- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 19:31:07 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
> Well, I'd prefer generic simple operations so a generic client can still do something about it With a `sor:LikeVideo` the client still can "do something". After all the description includes all the required details: the expected body, the URI (possibly template), the method, in the future possibly the media type(s). My issue is, as I understood `foo:Link/foo:Unlink` is that it would prescribe some details of how to invoke the operation (specific body, media type, HTTP method?). If that is not the case, then I find it useless and we should only ever use plain `hydra:Operation` in the core while allowing custom, API-specific terms which can simplify discovery and building of the UI. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/134#issuecomment-335031842 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 8 October 2017 19:30:57 UTC