Re: FYI: Open Forum : Long Email: Introducing Human Centric AI as a SIG-Topic

Dear Colleagues,

Per attached; below is the text put forward in the submission to seek to
create an ISOC Human Centric AI SIG (global).  There are more than 110
active ISOC chapters across six continents.

There are various past works that have been done previously to make
progress towards this type of concept..  There is significant complimentary
between the role and activities of ISOC and that of W3C.
NB; Also,
- https://www.w3.org/2019/07/isoc.html
- https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Offices/ChaptersAndOffices.html
- https://www.w3.org/2009/11/isoc-w3c-faq
-
https://www.w3.org/news/2009/internet-society-and-w3c-strengthen-relationship-to-help-ensure-open-global-internet/


(there are many others, ie: https://www.google.com/search?q=isoc+w3c )

If you would like to support this initiative to create a Human Centric AI
SIG; and are not already a member of ISOC (global);

https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/

Once you have joined, then go to https://connect.internetsociety.org/
and find the community 'open forum', this may be the
link:https://connect.internetsociety.org/communities/community-home?CommunityKey=3a9fa082-a518-475d-9e7f-ecec4ffe56dd

This application was supported by some notable people, to whom i am very
thankful...

Notably therein; as to support the secretariat role, both Roger Clarke
https://www.rogerclarke.com/ and Terry Hanisch
https://www.linkedin.com/in/terry-hanisch-3071a6a/ have volunteered and are
expected to co-facilitate this important role; whereby the belief is that
their combined skillsets will in-turn provide enormous wisdom to support
world-class stewardship of this very important activity.

Roger is one of two receipiants of the Australian Privacy Medal (
https://www.rogerclarke.com/DV/APM-091112.html ) his works on 'identity'
https://www.rogerclarke.com/ID/ have been instrumentally supportive for my
works, over a long period of time. Roger has also had a long-term
involvement with ISOC-AU ( https://internet.org.au/ ), and the Australian
Privacy Foundation ( https://privacy.org.au/ )  amongst the many aspects to
his luminary works overtime.

Terry has had very senior roles in various parts of government as a
'metadata' 'guru'...  he has also had a long-term role with Web Science
Australia, which is in-turn an Australian 'arm' of https://webscience.org/

There are others that have been involved in the establishment of this
opportunity,  from many parts of the world; which i will seek to illustrate
at some time in the near future.

Note also; I have set-up a telegram group; as noted,
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-humancentricai/2023Sep/0006.html
( https://t.me/HumanCentricAI ) which i hope will help to improve our means
for collaboration / cooperative works; Whilst considering the use of
telegram to be 'unofficial' and that we should be looking to establish a
W3C Human Centric AI CG Community meeting, soon...

ISOC SIG Topic Submission Text Below; (per the form, attached also as a
PDF).

Timothy Holborn.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

*Humancentric AI SIG *

*Introduction *
Human Centric AI; technology, socio-economics, cyber security and
international trade systems, have particular requirements to support the
needs of natural persons via technologically defined solutions, sought to
be defined via ‘commons’ works, to act as a force of good for human rights.

The intended purpose was twofold;
- To support ‘consciousness’, human rights & equitable supports for rule of
law;
- To ensure support for peaceful resolution of disputes through the use of
electronic evidence.

Whilst there are competing definitions of ‘Human Centric AI’, as is also
now the case for the term ‘web’. The construct of the term ‘human centric’
(ai) was defined in relation to W3C Works that via various group efforts
sought to create the building-blocks needed to make available as an option,
the means to elect to use systems whereby the management of information and
thereby support for the empowerment of human rights and law; be defined in
such a way, whereby human beings were provided the means to define and be
supported in managing their own human agency electronically, and that of
anyone whom they owe responsibilities of guardianship (ie: parents / kids).

W3C Works have matured and now, the social factors needs to be addressed,
which will undoubtedly lead to more technical work. The outcomes provide
the means to support natural persons as foundational tenants for the use of
the peoples internet, as a tool and media system for human rights supports.
These works intend to employ IPv6, DNS (ICANN), WWW (W3C)/Semantic Web
(RDF) and various emergent protocols; whilst also redesigning email & other
‘identifier’ systems, supported by personal ontology and personal software
agents. There are many differences, the job of this SIG is to work through
them. The broader outcome sought; is advancement to a knowledge age
peacefully, dignifying goals stated by Vannevar Bush & many others
thereafter.

*What types of activities will you conduct? *
 A W3C ‘human centric ai’ group has been established, and this is intended
to support the extension of those works.

The activities are thought to be as follows;

Definitions: The means to,

define a particular framework for defining what ‘human centric ai’ is
technically progress works to define ‘safety protocols’ sought to be
brought about for it.
Interoperability, portability and other linked issues are considered to be
amongst the ‘safety protocols’ scope of works.

Use-Cases: illustrating examples,

The process will involve people illustrating future ‘visions’, or creative
works that are intended to be supported by ‘human centric ai’ systems; and
thereby, circulated and advanced by empowered participants who thereby get
involved in defining requirements, undertaking SWOT analysis, etc.

*Policy Work *
IF people are to be provided the means to manage their own personal lives
via internet; then, there are various requirements, including IPv6 subnets,
ICANN Domain names, Cryptography requirements, etc.

There are also various social requirements; such as the means to address
bad actors in ways that conform to human rights principles and/or
traditional considerations, as now need to be transposed to support this
digital transformation series of requirements.

There is advocacy work required in regions around the world,
inter-domestically, to ensure key policy and decision makers locally are
aware of these options that are different to how people use ‘internet’
today, whether they understand the difference between an application such
as facebook, the web & internet; or not.

There are very significant discussions to be had about the nature and
notion of ‘identity’; who we are as individuals and what our basic needs
are, to be provided peaceful support for self-determination and in-turn
also, what requirements are necessary for accountability & how can these
systems be defined ontologically.

There are also very significant works needed to define supporting
apparatus, that would seek to empower personal & private human centric - ai
agents; with ‘commons’ knowledge required to support the function of those
agents / software; which in-turn, should be achieved without ‘digital
slavery’ practices, processes or supply / distribution chain implications.

As is distinct to recreation or sleep; Many people spend time doing work
online, so how can this be socioeconomically articulated both in support of
human rights and inturn consequently also, taxation systems to supports for
civic infrastructure works As a human family and how we may be defined by
what it is that we do, to positively impact others.

The measures of these works are expected to support the new definition of a
billionaire; he or she who positively impacts the lives of a billion
people. It is hoped that this may be an attribute that is made possible for
many, irrespective of where they are born in our world. It is understood
that WHO is seeking to immediately progress ‘digital identity’ works for
health.

The belief is that the production of medicinal environments can yield far
better outcomes than pharmaceuticals via digital identifiers, alone. Human
Centric AI in the intended constructs; yields means for the ontological
designs of our works, infospheres, inforgs and through our sociosphere
efforts to produce a ‘knowledge age’ our biosphere relationships.

Yet there are many challenges, which reflects the lack of effective prior
works in the many areas that now need to be addressed. For works relating
to Human Rights / digital humanitarian infrastructure, these works are
focused upon seeking to ensure fair compensation for useful works; only.

As to; both,
- eradicate ‘digital slavery’,
- negate ‘royalties’ or other usury problems
- support the ability to deliver ‘obligation free’ outcomes, morally.

*Why You Should Select This Topic? *

In-order to progress our humanity towards a Knowledge Age, we need ‘Human
Centric AI’ technology.

Whomever delivers these outcomes; will yield better Cyber-Security, Human
Rights supporting Socio-Economic Infrastructure to radically transform
productivity capabilities.

So lets do it together; as members of our Human Family, here on Earth:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHB_G_zWTbc

On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 07:50, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Please find the content from the email I have forwarded to the ISOC Open
> Forum (copy/paste), below...
>
> any questions, feedback, concerns or otherwise; let me know.
>
> NB:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-humancentricai/2023Sep/0003.html
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm writing to the list to introduce my works and ideas about the future
> of Human Centric AI.
>
> Whilst it is my hope that we will successfully bring about this SIG and
> through that engage in the discussions and works that provide our sense of
> what the requirements for these new types of systems and agents will be, i
> thought i would share with you some of my considerations, thoughts and
> (draft) works that have been done overtime.
>
> I note that the submission has attracted support from some wonderfully
> skilled, talented and highly capable individuals who are very well placed
> to help to advance the beginnings of this topic, as the efforts become
> coordinated should this opportunity succeed in attracting sufficient
> support, as required to bring it about.
>
> I will follow-up with more details about the social aspects of the history
> at a later stage, whilst encouraging others to reach-out and become added
> to the list!
>
> <https://www.humancentricai.org/>
>
> There is also a historical website: https://www.humancentricai.org/   and
> humancentricai.xyz has also been obtained, to support both the W3C &
> hopefully also ISOC works.  Without support, these works are unlikely to
> develop to the level required to bring the outcomes about in a way that
> could otherwise be achieved, for humanity.
>
> These works are not new, indeed, i have made a significant effort to bring
> about the tooling to support the creation of these agents, over a very long
> period of time..
>
> Quick History:
>
> Knowledge Banking Doc 2012 (A Summary from back then)
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/13jjiVON6uodPX3fwoiZbvQ43IjzJnOLc/view?usp=sharing> (NB:
> More expansive document early 2013
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EOTzwJmgJhuFl7uvKhlUwmUO6FcQXd0_/view?usp=sharing>
>  )
>
> Why Fixing "Fake News" is a difficult problem to solve 2017
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fvrYlTYUCYQMjW4pTel6QOIvJ03GtQT7/view?usp=sharing>
>
> The Human Centric infosphere 2018
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bDwFjfgvS_snBhnH_TUZgFTrfpW3BzIv/view?usp=sharing>
>
> Protecting Citizens & Critical Identifier Attacks 2018
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fqaK2eplB-UkQK84_tgjGMX1LvEjTN57/view?usp=sharing>
>
> I spoke at the auIGF in 2014.  Then, as I was publically defining the
> 'Human Centric' concept via the w3c works,
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rww/2016Feb/0015.html
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2016Feb/0031.html
>
> In 2017 i produced: https://2017.trustfactory.org/ as was part of that
> work, i first published: www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9vROTibKiE on christmas
> day 2016...
>
> The Credentials
> <https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/2014/08/06/call-for-participation-in-credentials-community-group/>(from
> the Web Payments <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8cIYzy5MIA> works) led
> to the 'digital identity' rollout via other forms of market participants,
> globally, during covid... FWIW: I disagreed, noting that there are
> different ideologies that exist and it is my opinion that it is quite
> important to ensure that there are different options allowed; so long as,
> they provide support for human rights & rule of law as well as if not
> better than, the alternatives. As far as i can tell, their solutions most
> often define people via a wallet with a shared private key; whereas, it is
> my strong view that these types of solutions cannot support Human Centric
> AI, at least, not in the way i intended to create the tools to support.
>
> I had already been working on this concept of trying to figure out how to
> deliver the first 'knowledge banks
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MfD4QIGyXioS_liFY66HRwkcrjBAhdtc/view?usp=sharing>'
> as i called them, having made some progress locally ('internet australia'
> or ISOC-AU) whilst also having prepared documentation for a 'Web Civics'
> SIG in 2019
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1o1FrGelPmWfA6olhKik--UzSBGH1Rz4o/view?usp=sharing>
> ...
>
> Whilst the notion of needing to support the AI Agents, which is the
> interface to the 'data storage' environment (ie: web-payments, credentials
> / verifiable claims, rww - as is now advanced as solid); was known long
> ago, i didn't previously lead with this term, as is now the case; but
> therein, one of the major threats to successfully achieving the goals of
> these works, was that whomever implements the first network for storing
> peoples 'data', could be the last. That if a commercial approach to support
> human rights was undertaken; then whoever implements the first 'network' if
> done commercially, would likely seek to ensure that they're the only
> provider available.  This was sought to be addressed as a major risk /
> threat; which, has been the main underlying reason for seeking to achieve
> the implementation of this infrastructure via ISOC...
>
> now, many years later; Human Centric AI SIG running for Election!
>
> The ISOC Human Centric AI SIG (special interest group
> <https://www.internetsociety.org/sigs/>) proposal for election is a
> significant milestone; whereby you, the members, are now provided the
> option to vote on whether or not ISOC should advance these very important
> works.
>
> I hope this outline will provide enough information about the many aspects
> and aspirational goals that i hope to achieve by progressing works to bring
> about Human Centric AI Agents, at large.
>
> The basis upon which Human Centric AI agents can be brought about,
> requires the means to ensure that people have a meaningful useful
> relationship with the records about their lives. The means to achieve these
> goals requires the information to be stored in particular ways; as well as
> the means to process many 'social' factors, in addition to the technical
> aspects.
>
> Whilst there is a very wide-spectrum of 'things to do';
>
> 1. The internet today is without 'digital embassies', places where the
> most vulnerable are provided the means to retain access to the digital
> records of their lives...
>
> Whether the threat of losing all the information about their lives is due
> to hardware failure, cyber attacks, poverty, alleged crime or serving time
> in prison; or circumstances pertaining to 'alleged' refugees; who need to
> prove the merits of their circumstance, before being afforded refugee
> status; the means to ensure HUMAN RIGHTS are afforded to all, requires some
> sort of 'infrastructure provider' to help to ensure these capacities are
> part of the 'digital transformation' outcomes...
>
> In-order for a 'human centric ai' agent (software agent / processor); to
> function, it requires the comprehensive use of the information about the
> human being who 'owns' it..  the data-subject..
>
> This capability is not merely a 'wallet', rather, it involves a series of
> complex requirements in-order to support, at the core of it, 'selfhood' of
> the natural person...  it's about support for 'personal ontology', which is
> itself a very complex topic...
>
> *"personal ontology is concerned with the kinds of things that might
> exemplify those properties, such as immaterial souls, human animals,
> embodied minds, bundles of perceptions, etc."  source: rutgers.edu
> <https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/48409/>*
>
> The implications are profound.
>
> This capability / that's similar yet different to a 'hosting service';
> then needs to be defined in a manner that is portable, between providers;
> and there are many policy areas that need to be explored in-order to
> deliver the means to best support this infrastructure.
>
> 2.  'Web Civics', 'Permissive Commons', 'Human Rights', Social Web and
> Ending Digital Slavery.
>
> These 'Human Centric AI' agents; require 'commons' information structured
> in a particular way, as to then compute informatics processes both; in
> relation to the aspects pertaining to 'selfhood' (the intimate, private,
> 'vault' of self); and in-turn also, the social or broader world as does
> in-turn relate to 'personhood' as is in philosophy and law, a term that is
> closely tied with legal and political concepts of citizenship, equality,
> and liberty.
>
> More specifically, whilst 'personhood' infrastructure often now exists for
> legal personalities (companies, organisations, incorporated entities and in
> some regions, software); the means to support natural persons in their own
> private capacity and/or with associative supports for persons for whom
> guardianship relates (ie: children, elderly, severe disability; or
> temporarily in circumstances such as hospitalisation); does not really
> exist...
>
> The internet also lacks the infrastructure needed to support humanitarian
> works online, at scale, on fair-terms; which in-turn acts to extinguish our
> capacities to produce the infrastructure needed to remedy these incredibly
> significant problems.
>
> At an 'informatics' level; the notion of 'permissive commons', refers to
> an 'uplift' of 'open-data', which has historically been provided in very
> basic forms of informatics resources, lacks many features and is largely
> not decentralised...
>
> *"The Legal interpretation of the term 'commons' is defined as Something
> that is common is owned equally by two or more people, such as a piece of
> land. A Tenancy in Common is an interest in land wherein at least two
> people share ownership." Source: legal dictionary
> <https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/common>*
>
> Therein; within this 'social' domain; there are different levels of
> 'centricity', including 'human centric', 'agent centric' and 'entity
> centric' layers that relate to the stewardship of different kinds of
> informatics resources.  These resources then need to be made available in a
> way that supports tamper-evidence, provenance, version control and the
> means to make use of those resources locally; by Human Centric AI agents,
> that are then involved in producing new records (temporally); that makes
> use of those resources via links...
>
> In-effect; the requirements for a 'human centric ai' agent, to function
> effectively, locally, on consumer electronics (ie: laptops, desktops, local
> home-network devices, etc); requires both the decentralisation of the Giant
> Global Graph <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_Global_Graph> as well
> as extensive language works.
>
> Therein; whilst it is hoped that this may be performed in a manner that is
> supported by 'entity centric' considerations; such as, that the use of a
> version of UN human rights instruments that can support the utility of
> those terms for agreements between one-another, being supported by the UN
> (which has been a historically difficult objective to achieve); somehow,
> these informatics resources need to be produced and held in trust or
> furnished some form of morally honourable stewardship; and the volume of
> works needed, are extensive.
>
> Whilst the 'smart data storage' systems are able to be federated (ie: a
> person has an online 'backup' on a 'knowledge bank' // host; as well as a
> home server (ie: mac mini); and elements on their devices (ie: laptops /
> desktops / mobile phones); akin to a 'personal cloud',
>
> The 'ontologies' that most pervasively exist today are built upon the old
> 'mainframe' based requirements, in which the vast majority of the tools
> define 'consumers' as 'things', not people.  the ontologies do not easily
> support our humanity, our selfhood, our 'status' as 'observers'; nor our
> natural languages...
>
> Whilst there are many misnomers out there about AI and how different forms
> of AI science functions; in-order to fabricate 'human centric ai', we need
> to create spatio-temporal (space / time) natural language ontologies; that
> are formatted with both graph & vector informatics, in a way that can be
> employed on consumer electronics with a relatively small memory /
> computational footprint.
>
> With the study and computational implementation of natural languages;
> comes also, the process through which our history, culture, the history of
> words and events become embodied within the structured data-resources; that
> are then called upon, contextually, in relation to our activities both 'of
> ourselves', and indeed also socially; as to form 'sense-making' apparatus...
>
> upon which, all else employs to produce the informatics requirements
> needed; to support the way these 'human centric ai' agents are made able to
> function...
>
> including the means through which 'values credentials' or instruments that
> are able to be used when forming relationships electronically with
> one-another online, such as to include but not be limited to human rights
> based instruments; codes of conduct, laws, etc… that are then able to be
> appended to reflect the changes in law and/or relationships that occur
> throughout life, whilst still maintaining the ability to support the nature
> of historical informatics.
>
> The consequential implication of these works is that, we need to figure
> out a way through which people are able to be paid fairly for their useful
> works & contributions; in a manner that does not lead to rendering
> obligations in perpetuity, or some form of 'tax' on our 'thoughtware'...
> This in-turn requires the construction of solutions that address these
> challenges both technically (ie: appropriate economic mechanisms),
> organisationally (stewards, governance) and legally (ie: 'human rights'
> software licensing, contracts, etc.).
>
> What this is thought likely to end-up doing; is to lead to a circumstance
> where we will be testing a framework to support human rights (ie: fair work
> terms, means to address (digital) slavery, exploitation, corruption, etc.);
> as we seek to construct the tooling needed, to produce 'human centric ai'
> infrastructure; that is then intended, to be equipped to support the
> development of 'peace infrastructure projects' world-wide; as required, to
> achieve SDGs (sustainable development goals).
>
> 3. (Cyber) Safety (Security) implications
>
> So, it is important to note that the objective of these works should be to
> provide an OPTION rather than a 'mandate'. There are various alternatives
> that have been invested into by various people at levels of great
> significance.  interoperability & portability is considered to be an
> important part of the requirements...  However, these systems are different.
>
> The tooling that has been advanced over the decades, considers the use of
> Signed RDF resources, decentralised informatics, the use of Domain Names,
> DNS records, IPv6 subnets (Security extensions), TLS certs, DLTs, TLS,
> OIDC, WebAuthn, etc...  The technical methods are intended to support the
> needs of legitimate law-enforcement & cyber security requirements (rule of
> law / legal requirements, evidentiary systems, etc.); as well as providing
> comprehensive protections against 'insider threat' vectors, etc.
>
> Part of the 'human centric' concept; is that, it is not 'governments' who
> breach peoples human rights, it is people, human beings - who have a job in
> a public institution; who is either carrying out their duties in a lawfully
> honourable manner, or is not; and per 'rule of law' the place to decide
> disputes where required, is in a court of law, should peace be sought;
> rather than corruption or protection under some statute that pertains to
> acts of war.
>
> Historically, there has been an unfortunately low level of support for
> rule of law; so much so, that it is common that many people are engaged in
> unlawful activities, when considered in association to commonplace
> activities, that are not better addressed, by law.  but if there is no
> support for rule of law, then the importance of addressing these issues is
> mute.
>
> SO, the informatics environment creates what i call 'social encryption';
> in which, through the moral inclusion of natural persons as a first-class
> 'internet citizen' (via their 'human centric ai' agent, a 'webizen'); the
> cryptographically associative temporal records of what people do, are
> spread across the tenants involved in whatever happened; and this in-turn,
> becomes an incredibly secure 'social' 'fabric', where the ability to
> entirely mute the facts of what happened to anyone involved, becomes a
> problem about hacking the internet… or the decision of a judge in a court
> of law…
>
> not just one 'node'... or database... Or privateer…. Law.
>
> This is in-turn supported via the 'permissive commons' aspects; whereby,
> there are means to temper threats, via law...  but that also, the means to
> engage in acts of violence and/or manipulate circumstances improperly (ie:
> corruption activities) is significantly disaffected.
>
> this is thought likely to challenge many commonly accepted practices, in
> many different areas...  as the informatics systems, promote an elevation
> of our capacities as a human family; from an 'information age', to an
> ontologically astute series of fabrics for the promotion of a 'knowledge
> age'..  this is in-turn considered essential, should we figure out how to
> empower every human being on the planet with the means to find something
> useful to do, that may positively benefit others; and that, they can just
> go do it...
>
> To achieve SDGs, it is my view, that we want to ensure there is support
> for 'medicinal earth' outcomes; what this means, is that we need to
> construct the knowledge fabrics needed in-order to support the means for
> people to rehabilitate the soils, environments and build medicinal villages
> and societies; where the knowledge of how to make use of flora, fauna and
> funga; when blended with the use of a personal human centric ai agent,
> provides the means for people to know how to support their wellbeing via
> what they consume; and, how they are then also able to work towards the
> construction of outcomes that improve our biosphere, our sociosphere and
> the socioeconomic standing and opportunities available to themselves, their
> children and more broadly their communities.. our communities...
>
> Whilst these goals invariably require economic recognitions; methods,
> systems and processes; the implication also becomes, one of legal
> responsibility in relation to the gainful work activities that people do
> either online, or in a manner empowered by online systems.
>
> 4.  Harmoniously 'competitive' environments for the promotion of
> humanitarian 'digital transformation' works...
>
> It has been my observation that the vast majority of persons involved in
> forming political decisions about the future of artificial intelligence, in
> particular, whilst they have highlighted the importance of 'human centric
> ai'; seemingly, the lens in which they consider what is best; more
> specifically focuses upon the advancement of global 'platforms' and in-turn
> also, the desires of governments; which often also, acts to negate the
> needs of citizens whose troubles relate to mistreatment by government
> employees and contractors.
>
> It appears that technically; there is simply a lack of awareness of the
> possibilities, which are often considered therefore 'theoretical' until
> such a time, as they have a fully produced embodiment made available to
> them as a consumer; to then be empowered, to think about.
>
> so, there's a need to seek out the 'old skool geeks' in our world; to help
> produce those RD&D outcomes, whilst is it also CRITICAL that we seek out
> supports from professionals in many, many different fields; to work through
> the various implications via its many lenses.  Therein; a variety of
> different approaches have been rapidly developed and whilst i consider
> these approaches to be different, the means to ensure that there is
> interoperability, portability and ecosystem supports to ensure other
> ecosystems can work with human centric ai systems and vice versa; without
> impugning the properties of Human Centric AI systems and/or one or any
> classes of these forms of systems; in some form of undeclared manner, that
> would act detrimental to the underlying moral worth & cyber-security
> properties, of these systems.
>
> 5. ISOC
>
> It is my strong belief; that the fastest and best available option to
> provide this infrastructure is via ISOC chapters.
>
> This is then in-turn able to support the promotion of other 'digital
> transformation' works, in a time-frame believed to be far more quickly
> brought about, than what may otherwise come about via the UN; particularly
> given the apparent 'platform centric' focus of its efforts based upon how
> it has been informed of the options.  There have been several occasions
> where professionals from the political field have told me that they do not
> understand the technology and are dependent upon what they are told by
> 'industry experts', but in this situation; those who are most equipped to
> provide the level of professional engagement sought by the public sector,
> is in-fact the global platforms who have every interest in seeking to
> ensure that they are THE critical REQUIREMENT for the future of
> THOUGHTWARE.  As all legal personalities (legal personhood) have the right
> not to self-incriminate (a rule of law principle); there has been an
> absence of representation for the needs of human beings, and this situation
> must be turned around somehow...
>
> The productivity losses alone, warrant the investment needed to deliver
> the outcomes we need to produce a 'trust factory' to deliver 'human centric
> ai' that can then be trusted as a form of technological infrastructure to
> support our thoughtware... our human agency, life.
>
> This is not intended to mean - that there should be no other options;
> indeed, if that were the case then the meaning of 'human centric ai' would
> likely become THE TOPIC that people seek to fight over, to define, as to
> maximise profits; and we, will likely be consumed.
>
> There are many questions that remain outstanding, that are not simply
> about the 'technical standards' although works in those areas is also
> critical; rather, there are various notions of 'platform providers' but in
> these frameworks, people are in-effect their own 'platform provider' in
> many ways; and whilst there are many benefits that are envisaged possible
> (ie: paying people for useful work via micropayments and/or otherwise
> (therefore also taxation), local jurisdictional supports (therefore
> improved access to justice); as these systems have not existed previously,
> the ramifications of how they are best able to be supported to promote
> human rights (inc. rule of law); is yet to be better understood, as is
> necessary, prior to encoding rules into 'ontologies'.  Given the
> differences, there have been suggestions that this is in-turn some form of
> 'new internet', or similar... some means that seeks to distinguish how
> these systems operate as to support law; as to ensure that any measures
> taken to address the problems with 'platforms' do not act to
> lock-humanity-out, of being furnished the tooling needed for human rights,
> human dignity, peace via these forms of Human Centric AI Ecosystems. In
> some ways, it is not unlike the advent of Linux, as is now instrumental.
>
> Most people who have had an instrumental historical role with the creation
> and development of the internet, have had an involvement at some stage with
> Internet Society.  Whilst some may not still be involved, it is hoped that
> the right type of purposeful objective may well lead to many becoming more
> involved, once again...
>
> It is my view; that whilst the challenges are significant, the best known
> opportunity to address these challenges is via uplifting the infrastructure
> that is; Internet Society...  In-turn, there are many 'social issues' that
> need to be addressed, which is thought to be part of the 'wheel-house' of
> ISOC in relation to internet governance infrastructure; and relationships
> had or held historically, internationally.
>
> ROLE WITH W3C
>
> W3C is the historical venue for establishing 'web standards' which is
> loosely, both the 'world wide web' as well as the 'web of data', or the
> underlying tooling that has been defined over decades, to power software
> agents (ai).
>
> W3C does not historically get involved in works pertaining to the 'social
> factors'. rather, W3C is the place to support the development of 'web
> standards' that are provided support via the patent pools of its members.
>
> Whereas Internet Society and its chapters do Actively engage in 'internet
> policy' related matters.  This has historically been associated with
> regional IGF events throughout the world, which then leads to the
> international IGF that has been a critical means through which the UN / ITU
> has in-turn been informed by the global internet community at large.
>
> Whilst these frameworks are seemingly a topic of discussion via the UN
> Digital Compact (digital transformation agenda, etc.); i am not aware of
> any other existing capabilities, that may be extended to support
> humanitarian 'knowledge banks' for those most in need; and, as a means to
> progress 'web civics' works, on peace infrastructure projects whilst
> looking to provide support for human rights via this approach that is
> squarely focused upon the practice of doing so via 'Human Centric AI'
> systems.
>
> One of the finer points herein; is that one of the long-term challenges
> has been, to seek to ensure that whatever the first implementation is, does
> not become the last implementation; but rather, a means to support the
> stimulus required to support what some have called a 'human centric
> internet', but is moreover about the means to make use of technology as
> tools; to promote, supports for human rights; particularly, for those who
> most require the useful employment of those rights, in a manner that best
> supports peace.
>
> Yet moreover, whilst the 'social factors' are more about the works that
> 'should' be done via ISOC (not w3c); the outcomes are then likely to inform
> what works could or should be progressed, via the W3C Human Centric AI
> <https://www.w3.org/community/humancentricai/> group, set-up earlier this
> year...  Importantly also, the means to figure out how to fund the work of
> people doing humanitarian work, in a manner whereby humanity is the
> intended beneficiary; is significantly uplifted should these ISOC works
> become successful; and in-turn, equipped by supporters.
>
> 6. Values Credentials
>
> I have started, today, writing some AI compatible versions of the ISOC
> Code of Conduct and Mission Statement.  I am yet to seek to address the
> privacy policy…
>
> https://github.com/WebCivics/isoc-hc-ai-sig-prep/tree/main/ontology
>
> This is the beginnings of an example of how we are able to create online
> resources that provide declarative semantics, that then provide the means
> to support the use of Human Centric AI agents.  These processes require a
> great deal of work, to ensure supports of Human Rights; and address the
> many difficult use-cases that relate to the procedural requirements
> associated with the dynamics of multi-agent systems; and how to seek to
> ensure optimisation in a way that can better ensure systems promote
> supports that ensure decisions are correct in the eyes of history not
> simply otherwise, as assumed at the time a claim was made.  These
> considerations have many implications, that in-turn need to be worked
> through as to support human rights based outcomes.
>
> See Also Draft Example of UDHR Values Credentials
> <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1q6Cl__FbUddtKtBPxw2KDviO_PEl7Ti-XYZOT1EQM14/edit#slide=id.p>.
> (more notes below
>
> 7. Technical & Related Notes
>
> Whilst i have been working on a particular form of ecosystem, to support
> private and personal AI agents that operate in a particular way; socially,
> this is not something that i seek to define personally; rather, the moral
> and honourable practice method, is seeking to engage with others and figure
> out what we, as a community whom are involved, agree upon; after,
> discovery, discussion, processing the options; Nonetheless,
>
> It is my belief that the best available option for producing a 'backwards
> compatibility spec'; which is basically about defining a set of
> requirements, that means systems are required to be able to export to those
> defined specifications; as to ensure users ("owners") can be migrated
> between systems whilst maintaining the functional use of those systems even
> if they've been migrated elsewhere, or that new rules have been applied
> (ie: due to court orders);  is most likely to be premised upon W3C
> Standards works, notwithstanding some known issues with respect to the
> documentation of these works; Therein, it is important to consider that not
> all application of technical standards are expressly defined in the
> documentation of those standards...
>
> Some of the older resources;
>
> - https://web.archive.org/web/20181116103202/https://crosscloud.org/
>
> - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lpeoEFowRcq3VTAp5LH6cFN251O9g9iE
>
>
> - Example of decentralised 'micro-blogging' app that used RWW servers:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhwAiTOFPrc
>
> - TimBL demonstrating 'solid' on his laptop (thought likely to be
> developed over decades?) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZB6d-4klmU
>
> The libraries now support verifiable claims / credentials, etc.
>
> There are several implementations, ranging from 'personal' solutions
> through to enterprise (ie: BBC) and government (IE: flanders, belgium)
>
>    -
>
>    https://pdsinterop.org/
>    -
>
>    https://solidproject.org/users/get-a-pod
>    -
>
>    If you would like to test one out; see,
>    -
>
>       https://github.com/pdsinterop
>       -
>
>       https://github.com/nodeSolidServer/node-solid-server
>       -
>
>       Related works: https://github.com/solid/
>
> There are a number of differences in relation to the approach; that is
> thought important for support of 'human centric ai' in the form, that i
> have been working towards...  In-part also, this relates to the use of
> domain names and consequently therefore also, IPv6.
>
> Herein; whilst Solid may not end-up being the solution for Human Centric
> AI, it is considered to be an option for commencing the process of
> constructing the decentralised informatics systems, that are then able to
> be uplifted overtime to better support Human Centric AI Agents & related
> systems.  The way these systems work is in a decentralised manner.
>
> Diagram: interface Example  (NB also: from ~2015 http://dev.webcivics.org/
>  )
>
> The image below illustrates some dev work that was done earlier this year,
> where a web-extension provides the capacity for people to 'log in' to their
> Human Centric AI (IdP via a Solid Server); and then launch 'apps'
> (html/css/js) locally in the browser; the implication being, that the
> 'social web' is baked into the browser (rather, underlying data-service,
> per image below); this then means that people can interact with any URI
> (web-page); and that their 'social' environment is defined by
> themselves...  not platforms... Solid can support implementations now, that
> support the ability to start to get a comprehension of how these systems
> work; and therefore also, what are the many implications that may need to
> be addressed via ISOC works.
>
> Work is presently being done to investigate how this may in-turn be
> integrated with a blockchain solution for micropayments / tokens /
> financial & non-financial currencies (which requires a 'vault' as is
> different to a 'wallet' as 'identity' is defined via the 'inforg
> <https://medium.com/webcivics/the-semantic-inforg-the-human-centric-web-reality-check-tech-50e2fa124ed4>
> ')
>
> It is important to note; that the underlying 'data services' that provide
> support for functions such as 'social-relationships' with other 'entities'
> are not managed by the 'app', but rather the underlying data-service…  This
> means that the context in which people manage the information in
> association to their relationships with others is in-turn - human centric;
> the 'social graph' or complex 'address book' / permissive
> commons-structures work in 'any  app'...
>
> Illustrative Diagram: Systems
>
> The below diagram was also produced earlier this year; as i was working
> through the process of figuring out how to define the 'natural language
> ontologies' and the systems needed to support it; that then provide the
> means for people to use natural language, to define how they seek to
> categorise relationships, for 'connections' with one-another and various
> other functions...
>
> In this diagram; the term 'web 3.0' refers to the sort of definitions made
> earlier: web.archive.org/web/20130128161834/http://jeffsayre.com/...
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20130128161834/http://jeffsayre.com/2010/09/13/web-3-0-powering-startups-to-become-smartups/>
>
>
> but that, not all functions can be supported either in the 'web browser'
> or via an extension; so there needs to be an underlying 'agent' (the human
> centric ai - agent); that supports the functionality required, to process
> information locally, act as an API interface for other forms of AI packages
> (ie: transformer models, etc);  and also, as a local 'server' that is then
> able to support the decentralised functionalities, etc...
>
>
>
> But herein are various considerations relating to the 'human centric'
> nature of the informatics design, whereby the means to support
> relationships without platform intermediaries is supported; but this
> in-turn leads to the need to consider various implications & the need for
> 'safety protocols'...
>
> These works are also being advanced to consider how addresses may be
> applied to 'things' (as distinct to people); as the means to figure out how
> to support humanitarian (tech) work online in a manner that promotes human
> rights, is considered to be a top priority; without seeking to make 'poor
> choices'...  Therein, whilst there is personal cryptography involved; it is
> more of a vault, than a wallet.
>
> NB: some more unfinished earlier work, illustrating in-part, some of the
> future objectives...
> webcivics.github.io/CooperativeProjects/projects.html
>
> Earlier this year, i also set-up; https://www.humancentricai.org/  and
> www.w3.org/community/humancentricai  and acquired the 'humancentricai.xyz'
> domain for use with standards communities; whereby the future hope, is that
> sufficient progress is made as to bring about the opportunity to migrate
> stewardship of 'web civics' and related efforts to any such future
> safe-harbour as to improve the means through which these long-term goals,
> can be progressed and hopefully therefore also; realised…
>
> The implementation I have been working on employs domain names, DNS
> records & IPv6 (security extensions, etc.); and, it has a 'host' framework
> to support pseudo-anonymised 'informatics'; but that largely, the means in
> which the AI agent operates, is local for people who have a laptop or
> similar...  This has then sought to be developed further with 'group'
> systems (ie: places of work, schools, etc.) that leverage off the existence
> of underlying 'human centric ai' supports provided to individuals.
>
> Then through the use of domain names as the primary means to form linkable
> identifiers (inc. use of DNS records); relationships are defined between
> people (/agents) in a manner that employs 'value credentials' that denote
> the shared 'values' that are expected to be supported by one-another in
> relation to that relationship; whereby, the terms and nature of
> relationships change overtime, and the artefacts end-up being supported via
> the 'permissive commons' frameworks; with legal support.
>
> FINAL NOTES
>
> Operationally, that is, in relation to the 'modal' structure of how i've
> been doing these works; i've observed many significant differences between
> the process in which i have sought to prosecute the development of
> technology to support human rights in this particular sort of way; as an
> individual, that has seemingly not been possible for the vast majority of
> others, whose works are facilitated through the lens of their role as an
> agent for an employer; sought, to represent the interests of their employer
> first & foremost..   It is my opinion that this dutiful methodology has had
> many very negative repercussions.
>
> Somehow, people need to be able to declare the requirements that are most
> important to them; because, they are human...  and without that humanity,
> being furnished the capacities needed to be supported as to grow
> peacefully, towards one's fullest potential:
>
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs
>
> It seems to me that there's not much good purpose to go create 'human
> centric ai' supporting systems; if, the objectives that are sought by those
> who empower the capacity for people to exist, seek to make unconscionable
> demands.   There are a plurality of very difficult human rights use-cases
> that have not been addressed very well in the public forums where web
> standards, and similar, are created...  there's a lot to do... but, the
> essence of it, becomes substantively about forging the apparatus through
> which we may better understand ourselves; and through us, our world..  both
> the space & inter-space… the nature, of who we are as persons & what it is,
> we do…
>
> I have provided an Appendix of resources below, that provides some more
> information. However, I would like to note that the protocol for making
> decisions is hoped to be via group decisions and that the links illustrate
> various factors that relates to the ISOC work sought to be done; in
> consideration of the complexities, but that these works are not necessarily
> ISOC works other than as necessary to support enablement. Group efforts are
> sought to be undertaken that may therefore be achieved through discussion
> and efforts to seek to ensure complementary good faith engagement on works
> seeking to form cooperative outcomes; which may lead to differences that
> could, for instance, be catered for by classifications or other means of
> categorisation.
>
> Overtime, it is hoped that the innovation tools to support work online
> will develop and that through the use of these tools, our means to make
> better efforts more productively will be improved.
>
> If you have any questions, concerns, issues, ideas or suggestions; or if
> you're simply excited and want to reach out, please do not hesitate to do
> so…
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHB_G_zWTbc
>
> Sincerely and with Kind Regards,
>
> Timothy Charles Holborn.
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/ubiquitous/
>
> https://www.humancentricai.org/
>
> http://webdev.intent.eco
>
>
> APPENDIX
>
> The Peace Infrastructure Projects Library
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tYFIggw8MIY5fD2u-nbwFRM6wqrhdmQZ>
>
> This is currently presented as a google drive folder, whilst it is hoped
> to create a decentralised 'semantic library' in future. The Library is
> constantly updated, contributions are welcomed and in particular it is
> encouraged that others form a similar folder; and then provide a link to
> that folder which can in-turn be added to one-anothers libraries… The
> source of this content is primarily via linkedin posts; however, when i
> perform research online or are forwarded documents, i also add them to this
> library.  The categorisation is difficult, as many documents relate to
> multiple topics; and the means to more easily make use of; and make
> (social) annotations is not well supported presently.  Note also, that i am
> influenced by my language skills (english) and place (Australia).  It is
> understood that there are different resources available to people with
> different skills to my own, and it is desirable that the means to uplift
> our ability to share knowledge is brought about via Human Centric AI
> Systems.
>
> Within this folder, the Tech Ethics Folder
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1uwGax8GvZA2jzJ_UFIoYppijZX4vDsoL> contains
> various publications about ethics and human rights.  The DevOps
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1C-_jdQwtWxyjftrvI0yUSEKfhzeaKTV0> folder
> contains various technical resources, and in particular therein, the
> DataScience
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18kpYSPz4yQMMn0IOfaPT7JyYD1wXEGMn> folder
> contains a large amount of information about various kinds of AI Sciences,
> whilst other miscellaneous AI publications are in the AI MISC
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tFYQBE3i0hyrsBCE_33TiLHtGA7XLBtC>
>  folder..
>
> The Blockchain & Web3
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1L-0fhDBLZJW-7OUxrdkUPmX3F9zQDOvx> folder
> contains files about that, alongside SSI (self sovereign identity); which
> is considered to be a different method for defining human identity, than is
> achieved via these Human Centric AI related approaches.
>
> The Gov & Defence related docs
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1RzE_QQbBRyE0druVpvffQoT5KDms_5mT> folder
> contains files and folders for regions, multi-governmental groups and
> Cyber
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1BVrg_6ss0v0RlnahjaM26eG40fvRfEZr> from
> a policy related intelligence point of view, as is supplemented by PsyOps
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Gsi4pjnIcjSdhyco3RI6j7py2qm4g5t5>
> .
>
> The ID - IoT - GIS - ARBR (metaverse)
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/11E7MvuGkM54RD5CeJvsG81ECS5H87UKS> folder
> contains files about 'things' and larger scale considerations such as
> industry 4.0, smart cities and mobility as a service, 'metaverse', etc..
>
> The Selfhood
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qtXrWitII3X_5fnbU0pZRikCrLMs21I-> folder
> seeks to collate information that pertains to human lives; education,
> health, psychology, consciousness studies and knowledge representation; and
> other social factors; and the QM
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1GQ-h6Ym69xMJxZSSMBjARwKxnKKqNqAu> folder
> (quantum) collates some of the information about quantum physics & related
> applications.
>
> It is thought probable that quantum physics has something to do with the
> function of 'mind' or 'consciousness'; however, the mechanism is unknown.
> There is years of research into the field of 'consciousness studies'...  I
> have a YouTube Playlist
> <https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_voTpRK9-o5RksERak4kOL40> as
> well as a Timeline
> <https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/timeline3/latest/embed/index.html?source=1r-bo83ImIEjSCmOFFMcT7F79OnCHDOGdkC_g9bOVFZg&font=Default&lang=en&hash_bookmark=true&initial_zoom=4&height=750#event-consciousness-qm-ai-studies-video-edition> Presentation
> that helps to provide further insights into the progression of works and
> theories in this complex field.
>
> NOTE: About 'language models', until recently a large language model was
> something like Babelnet cyc FrameNet Framester Lemon linguist list SUMO
> WordNet, etc.  However more recently, due to the emergence of transformer
> models the term 'large language model' is now far less clear.
> Consequently, the resources about language models is now in multiple places
> in the library.  The work to create a solution for spatio-temporal
> n-dimensional storage and use of resources such as language models, is
> described in the Spatio-Temporal: Human Centric AI Package Format
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Fwx3-YYyKgeigaScoMVoTFc3V2p-0jVwOg0IvMr8TZs/edit>
>  document.
>
> METHODS STUDY:  The method seeks to provide practice examples of how
> decentralised knowledge sharing could or should work.  This then supports
> the means to better understand future requirements for systems to support a
> 'hyper media library' and related works.
>
> Some Examples include;
>
>    -
>
>    Ted Nelson - Xanadu Space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=En_2T7KH6RA
>    -
>
>    British Museum - ResearchSpace -
>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaAv0SE7wis
>
> Youtube Libraries (video libraries)
>
> *Medicinal Earth*
>
> The Medicinal Earth concept is an upper-level 'objective' concept that I
> have started to use to inform the approach that I am seeking to bring
> about, particularly given the declared objective of WHO to address 'digital
> identity' as a matter of great importance for human health (and mental
> wealth)..
>
> The concept is about the idea that we use ICT / AI in a way that promotes
> our ability to understand how to create medicinal environments and in-turn
> through the use of knowledge, learn how to use those medicinals in our
> daily lives to support our health and wellbeing; both individually, and
> in-turn also moreover socially.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vpr1Hok5YfMyAFlKcz0eUxx
>
> I have also started on a list for fungi or funga, which was previously not
> well known by me.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vo4aRHKPha7jGOeB_22hCWL
>
> This in-turn feeds into the broader body of knowledge sought to be
> developed around,
>
> Biosphere Management;
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vovZZfPYe136pRjE6QotzQX
>
> Solving The Plastics Problem
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vrugX0s7t3rdGqyGtkYKDWz
>
> Improving Water Quality
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vpwHpGRTOKI47pPiWrdDQla
>
> Housing
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vob_3UTGlns9smlCYEWbEP5
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_voRLoOc1QIrb8pAXDjG4S61
>
> Energy
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_voj61kp4n0hyTfj1folDGBz
>
> In-effect, the useful outcome sought to be brought about by Human Centric
> AI systems and related supports; is to figure out how to address the
> real-world issues in our biosphere / sociosphere, that leads to negative
> consequences that act to inhibit healthy people and healthy environments
> that are needed to provide the supports required to deliver those health &
> mental wealth fundamentals.  This means that we need complex knowledge
> informatics systems; that are then able to be employed personally, with the
> use of personal information to provide context in relation to aspects of
> 'selfhood'. It is commonly the case that there are low-cost means to
> address many problems, but the barrier is whether or not the knowledge is
> available to identify and implement solutions to any such problems.
>
> *Consciousness*
>
> The studies into 'consciousness' (as afore mentioned) are applied in terms
> of seeking to attenuate the production of technology (AI / knowledge
> informatics sciences) that does not act to unduly interfere with natural
> agents.  This is increasingly now a field of study, by leading AI experts.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_voTpRK9-o5RksERak4kOL40
>
> Human Agency & Digital Identity
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vp7r7VvuGuaSipjxp9bI1_D
>
> Science & Spirituality
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRtuDWE10sVcfZmHqqH2qXPY0I1eHch7j
>
> Quantum
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vod7oKdLBUCEZkH0wCaFh8_
>
> *(note; fairly sure quantum systems, prefer vectors...)*
>
> *Economic*
>
>  See Draft Doc: Knowledge Economics: Project
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OBktQmBSt-Crq4r1A3PLJWEjMvQ0uBRo780ySo1BOrg/edit#heading=h.z6ne0og04bp5>
>   Knowledge Economics: Project
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OBktQmBSt-Crq4r1A3PLJWEjMvQ0uBRo780ySo1BOrg/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> I have added the 'human rights' aspects into this economic section, as
> human rights are either economically supported or conversely the abuse of
> human rights for profit / gainful purpose, is materially supported…
> Thereafter, are a range of considerations highlighted via various lists.
>
> Human Rights
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vrnPSQ41DnH0FpY1f9fgAR2
>
> Knowledge Capital
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vqrjn5j3Ldedw-NWUFKNhIW
>
> Economy
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vpYsIEl_gb9BUwFnp7EHh08
>
> BOT models
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vpjjpCi4DfO49p_3-QqwLuX
>
> Mission Model Canvas
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjDPolp9BAOHy3WBfBIULusFNWBs6amyn
>
> Innovation Markets
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vplID3vlHvdvN6k3ozI94im
>
> Coops
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vrkH-HlXct_Z3HKeZF6bB00
>
> Digital Receipts (note; note 'ontologically' defined in more useful ways,
> yet)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vrg0f9Id-s2qoDJOs56YdIB
>
> eCash (a candidate blockchain method)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vp0GJ1WgR2b9fvI89n0m9cn
>
> Pervasive Surveillance
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vqLxdLjyFae7ozEiAIKJw0Q
>
> Attention Economy
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vp9SeEKiGnvM7NdxoZvaorN
>
> TECH:
>
> These tech resources are mostly fairly basic…  but they may help get a
> grasp of some of the more basic concepts.  Note that the previously
> mentioned lists about Consciousness also have tech in it.
>
> AI
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vr5buCx-9K6DFmcs_0BtxRC
>
> Ethics & governance of AI (MIT)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj62-wQeg_DjuoWS4A_VYzLWtEVUZj1IO
>
> IoT
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vpewcqcz-XNu4NV3tCAl6Py
>
> New Internet
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_voyWh284YNHT44344S4-DU_
>
> What is Linked Data?
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vqZemkHpzb7-GWmzcUdGgfP
>
> Semantic Web
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vqWAb5NHkaEvsT9RA8--QkY
>
> Semantic Reasoning
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vqWAb5NHkaEvsT9RA8--QkY
>
> Virtuoso RDF Views over RDBMS Data Sources
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vqsYV4B_oXulV3ncJbFj0Hb
>
> Ontology Tools (note; mostly via OWL presently)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vr4BRBxfGhAPXboA9iAdZlQ
>
> RWW (solid), Credentials & Payments
>
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_vqI-SfZ3VRo8bs6jJF-Dmrs
>
> NOTE: I have started to work on a 'RWW / Solid' based video library; but
> have not finished it.
> https://github.com/mediaprophet/gitpages-video-project
>
> (Basically, all it needs is the JSON file…)
>
> After WSIS2023; Some work was done on seeking to figure out how to support
> the means to define a solution for SDG Learning & Knowledge Hubs
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D63FlICIOXcnLx_PYs0ByLYvc1B-BXqhhXGdaW_rIMI/edit>
>  SDG Learning & Knowledge Hubs: ProjectConcept
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D63FlICIOXcnLx_PYs0ByLYvc1B-BXqhhXGdaW_rIMI/edit>
> "
>
> The energy calculations need more work; as has, the work on figuring out
> how to define both human centric ai (for digital identity), and the
> 'medicinal earth' concept; as that relates to what might be best taught to
> people for useful purposes.
>
> Therein, there is both a 'recognition of prior learning' and ability to
> provide micro-credential 'wrappers' around educational content to test &
> quality what people have learned…
>
> This is in-turn something that is expected to enhance productivity; but
> that also, feeds into the Human Centric AI - underlying series of
> requirements; to better understand what people know, have studied and have
> gained skills, knowledge and capacities to support various kinds of work
> activities.
>
> seeAlso notes about Annotations - Knowledge Clouds
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/16R9CqN18O3v358jC5GpqJ59Vlw7-7HjxGpY_BE2eA-k/edit>
>  Annotations - Knowledge Couds WIP
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/16R9CqN18O3v358jC5GpqJ59Vlw7-7HjxGpY_BE2eA-k/edit>
>  …
>
> https://github.com/orgs/WebCivics/repositories
>
> Webizen AI Repos
>
> https://github.com/orgs/WebizenAI/repositories
>
> The Webizen AI repositories have some early work defining or working to
> integrate some host systems, as well as forming the basis to the client.
> In this method, that was done prior to the events that led to renewed
> 'standards' / internet governance related works; the host seeks to use a
> containerised approach for managing end-user 'hosts' which are then
> facilitated via tailscale (wireguard) open-source libraries; that are then
> supported by a variant of WebID-TLS & WebID-DNS (that afaik, doesn't
> actually exist otherwise); the main differences are the ontological methods
> sought to be used, that required testing prior to any work to seek to
> standardise in some way.
>
> This then provided a RWW (early solid) based client on the host-machine;
> which could then be employed via a web-browser extension, to support
> decentralised 'social' apps; whilst, the host environment provided support
> for payments, back-ups, continual presence & 'permissive commons' supports;
> alongside, IPv6 subnets and routing in connection to a users own domain
> name (TLD); which then led to modifications of the DNS supports provided
> via the wireguard based last-mile networking solution…
>
> The issue that became important to address; was how to support natural
> language ontologies, which are thereby required in-order to support
> implementation.  Whilst I had plans to create a commercial implementation;
> the problem became that I did not want to seek VC investment to do works
> that should be 'commons', such as is the case with human languages…
>
> Additionally; some initial work was done on seeking to advance a DID for
> GIT, incorporating support for SSH…  This has not been resourced either,
> noting that there is an express difference between GIT the subversion
> control protocol that is part of linux and available on almost any system;
> vs. github, which is a centralised product / platform…
>
> The other issue was in seeking to establish 'values credentials'; built
> upon the use of natural language supported - human rights instruments and
> similar… alongside ontologies for 'selfhood'...
>
> https://github.com/WebCivics/ontologies
>
> UDHR Values Credentials
> <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1q6Cl__FbUddtKtBPxw2KDviO_PEl7Ti-XYZOT1EQM14/edit#slide=id.p>
>  UDHR - Inter-Personal 'Value Credentials' Agreements
> <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1q6Cl__FbUddtKtBPxw2KDviO_PEl7Ti-XYZOT1EQM14/edit#slide=id.p>
>
> UHR Blockchain & Economics
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zirrCE-nP9mdFicdWSvEVTQjjG5Asb8q5RBd2LlJkOw/edit#>
>  UHR Blockchain
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zirrCE-nP9mdFicdWSvEVTQjjG5Asb8q5RBd2LlJkOw/edit>
>
> After some years trying to figure out how to get this done (note: UDHR in
> XML by Unicode <https://github.com/unicode-org/udhr>)
>
> I then attended WSIS2023 and this led to UN GDC involvement.  This is a
> draft document (incomplete) that relates to my considerations
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xetF-5dhyU-iuLV-Trn2P-m_BHbeK-N-6e0pOcbsx40/edit#>
> ; 20230430_UNGDC InspiredDoc - DRAFT
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xetF-5dhyU-iuLV-Trn2P-m_BHbeK-N-6e0pOcbsx40/edit?usp=sharing>
>
>
> ISOC 'values credential' (code of conduct) draft in RDF:
> https://github.com/WebCivics/isoc-hc-ai-sig-prep
>
> Note also, exhaustive amount of work required to illustrate or demonstrate
> considerations about the distinct values, implications, requirements, SWOT,
> etc..  alongside regionally contextual issues.
>
> There are many different kinds of 'artificial minds' or AI agents, indeed here
> is a list of some of them
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VixKXjZL31bZRXQS9J1FmvPyDzdkgE8B2-3fzPmRYNc/edit#gid=1227058217>
> .
>
>  But the question becomes, which sorts of ones, what sorts of
> characteristics are most important to you. What sorts of characteristics
> are most important for your children, your family, your community.  This is
> an opportunity to work through all those sorts of considerations; and then,
> define the socio-technical tooling required to bring about a different kind
> of option, Human Centric AI…
>
> If you are interested in this topic, if you have any questions; or if
> you're interested in getting involved in the work being done RIGHT NOW -
> Please, feel welcome to reach out... There's alot that still needs to be
> done.  I am quite sure i missed at least a few things in this document, but
> will be working to put up some web-resources; whilst not seeking to be the
> person who defines it all..  I hope, we are able to forge a sustainable
> means to engage in humanitarian works for the betterment of humanity,
> globally.
>
> Tim.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> timothy.holborn@gmail.com
> www.linkedin.com/in/ubiquitous
>