W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2017

Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report

From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:38:18 +0200
To: adanilo@chromium.org, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8122e526-a5a2-97e8-d8c9-5aa62227c715@tink.uk>
Thanks Travis and Alex. Just Steve, Sangwhan, Chaals and myself left to 
get on with this now!


On 08/09/2017 07:19, Alex Danilo wrote:
> Thanks Travis for doing the IndexedDB & referrerpolicy rows, that's very 
> helpful.
> 
> I've added data for my other rows in 
> https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/115 
> <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/115> but note, I'm not sure 
> how to test the sandbox navigation thing, so it's marked notTested in 
> that PR.
> 
> On 8 September 2017 at 15:17, Alex Danilo <xla@google.com 
> <mailto:xla@google.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Thanks Travis for doing the IndexedDB & referrerpolicy rows, that's
>     very helpful.
> 
>     I've added data for my other rows in
>     https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/115
>     <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/115> but note, I'm not
>     sure how to test the sandbox navigation thing, so it's marked
>     notTested in that PR.
> 
>     Alex
> 
>     On 8 September 2017 at 08:01, Travis Leithead
>     <travis.leithead@microsoft.com
>     <mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Thank you!
> 
>         And now, I've got all the data for mine and Arron's rows in the
>         table as part of: https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/114
>         <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/114>
> 
>         :)
> 
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com
>         <mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com>]
>         Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 3:31 PM
>         To: tink@tink.uk <mailto:tink@tink.uk>; public-html@w3.org
>         <mailto:public-html@w3.org>
>         Subject: RE: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report
> 
>         FYI: PR to fix the tables a bit before starting into the
>         report... https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/112
>         <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/112>.
> 
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk <mailto:tink@tink.uk>]
>         Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 8:44 AM
>         To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com
>         <mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com>>; public-html@w3.org
>         <mailto:public-html@w3.org>
>         Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report
> 
>         Thanks Travis. If you could give Arron a gentle nudge too,
>         that'd be appreciated.
> 
> 
>         On 05/09/2017 15:27, Travis Leithead wrote:
>          > Ah, thanks for the reminder; yes I'll do the same.
>          >
>          > -----Original Message-----
>          > From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk <mailto:tink@tink.uk>]
>          > Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 2:20 AM
>          > To: public-html@w3.org <mailto:public-html@w3.org>
>          > Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report
>          >
>          > Arron and Travis,
>          >
>          > We discussed this on the HTML call today. Everyone is going
>         to make a concerted effort to complete this within the next
>         week. Can you do the same? Thanks.
>          >
>          >
>          > On 23/08/2017 16:20, Léonie Watson wrote:
>          >> Editors,
>          >>
>          >> I've updated the draft implementation report:
>          >>
>         https://w3c.github.io/test-results/html52/implementation-report.html
>         <https://w3c.github.io/test-results/html52/implementation-report.html>
>          >>
>          >> It now includes all the updates noted in the Changes section
>         of the spec:
>          >> https://w3.org/tr/html52/changes/
>         <https://w3.org/tr/html52/changes/>
>          >>
>          >> Note: it may be the case that some of these can be removed
>         from the
>          >> implementation report because they do not affect interop.
>          >>
>          >> Please can you fill in the interop information for the
>         commits you
>          >> made (I've added names throughout the draft). Where the
>         person who
>          >> submitted the PR is not a WG member, I've used the name of
>         the editor
>          >> that approved the merge.
>          >>
>          >> The draft implementation report also includes features that
>         have been
>          >> removed, or which may be removed based on the things marked
>         "at risk"
>          >> during CR:
>          >> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/969
>         <https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/969>
>          >>
>          >> With the exception of the plugin API, these are all features we
>          >> pulled from 5.1 in the hope that interop might have improved
>         by now.
>          >> If you can help by verifying any/all of these again, that
>         would be welcome.
>          >>
>          >> We're tracking progress on the implementation report in this
>         issue:
>          >> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/990
>         <https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/990>
>          >>
>          >> The implementation report needs to be completed by Friday
>         8th September.
>          >> We'll then be able to open the CFC on transitioning the spec
>         to PR
>          >> the following week.
>          >>
>          >> Thanks.
>          >>
>          >
>          > --
>          > @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe diem
>          >
> 
>         --
>         @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe diem
> 
> 
> 

-- 
@LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
Received on Friday, 8 September 2017 08:38:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 September 2017 08:38:58 UTC