- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:37:40 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:38:18 +0200, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: > Thanks Travis and Alex. Just Steve, Sangwhan, Chaals and myself left to > get on with this now! I've done mine. There are a couple of things I cannot test in Safari anymore, but I don't think the results are necessary. If anyone has a working Mac (mine killed itself by refusing to charge from its working power supply :( ), feel free to add results. (Ditto for other browser engines) cheers > On 08/09/2017 07:19, Alex Danilo wrote: >> Thanks Travis for doing the IndexedDB & referrerpolicy rows, that's >> very helpful. >> I've added data for my other rows in >> https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/115 >> <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/115> but note, I'm not sure >> how to test the sandbox navigation thing, so it's marked notTested in >> that PR. >> On 8 September 2017 at 15:17, Alex Danilo <xla@google.com >> <mailto:xla@google.com>> wrote: >> Thanks Travis for doing the IndexedDB & referrerpolicy rows, that's >> very helpful. >> I've added data for my other rows in >> https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/115 >> <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/115> but note, I'm not >> sure how to test the sandbox navigation thing, so it's marked >> notTested in that PR. >> Alex >> On 8 September 2017 at 08:01, Travis Leithead >> <travis.leithead@microsoft.com >> <mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com>> wrote: >> Thank you! >> And now, I've got all the data for mine and Arron's rows in the >> table as part of: https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/114 >> <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/114> >> :) >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com >> <mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com>] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 3:31 PM >> To: tink@tink.uk <mailto:tink@tink.uk>; public-html@w3.org >> <mailto:public-html@w3.org> >> Subject: RE: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report >> FYI: PR to fix the tables a bit before starting into the >> report... https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/112 >> <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/112>. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk <mailto:tink@tink.uk>] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 8:44 AM >> To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com >> <mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com>>; public-html@w3.org >> <mailto:public-html@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report >> Thanks Travis. If you could give Arron a gentle nudge too, >> that'd be appreciated. >> On 05/09/2017 15:27, Travis Leithead wrote: >> > Ah, thanks for the reminder; yes I'll do the same. >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk >> <mailto:tink@tink.uk>] >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 2:20 AM >> > To: public-html@w3.org <mailto:public-html@w3.org> >> > Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report >> > >> > Arron and Travis, >> > >> > We discussed this on the HTML call today. Everyone is going >> to make a concerted effort to complete this within the next >> week. Can you do the same? Thanks. >> > >> > >> > On 23/08/2017 16:20, Léonie Watson wrote: >> >> Editors, >> >> >> >> I've updated the draft implementation report: >> >> >> https://w3c.github.io/test-results/html52/implementation-report.html >> <https://w3c.github.io/test-results/html52/implementation-report.html> >> >> >> >> It now includes all the updates noted in the Changes section >> of the spec: >> >> https://w3.org/tr/html52/changes/ >> <https://w3.org/tr/html52/changes/> >> >> >> >> Note: it may be the case that some of these can be removed >> from the >> >> implementation report because they do not affect interop. >> >> >> >> Please can you fill in the interop information for the >> commits you >> >> made (I've added names throughout the draft). Where the >> person who >> >> submitted the PR is not a WG member, I've used the name of >> the editor >> >> that approved the merge. >> >> >> >> The draft implementation report also includes features that >> have been >> >> removed, or which may be removed based on the things marked >> "at risk" >> >> during CR: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/969 >> <https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/969> >> >> >> >> With the exception of the plugin API, these are all >> features we >> >> pulled from 5.1 in the hope that interop might have improved >> by now. >> >> If you can help by verifying any/all of these again, that >> would be welcome. >> >> >> >> We're tracking progress on the implementation report in this >> issue: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/990 >> <https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/990> >> >> >> >> The implementation report needs to be completed by Friday >> 8th September. >> >> We'll then be able to open the CFC on transitioning the spec >> to PR >> >> the following week. >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe >> diem >> > >> -- >> @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe >> diem >> > -- Chaals is Charles McCathie Nevile find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 8 September 2017 12:38:08 UTC