Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report

Thanks Travis for doing the IndexedDB & referrerpolicy rows, that's very
helpful.

I've added data for my other rows in https://github.com/w3c/
test-results/pull/115 but note, I'm not sure how to test the sandbox
navigation thing, so it's marked notTested in that PR.

On 8 September 2017 at 15:17, Alex Danilo <xla@google.com> wrote:

> Thanks Travis for doing the IndexedDB & referrerpolicy rows, that's very
> helpful.
>
> I've added data for my other rows in https://github.com/w3c/
> test-results/pull/115 but note, I'm not sure how to test the sandbox
> navigation thing, so it's marked notTested in that PR.
>
> Alex
>
> On 8 September 2017 at 08:01, Travis Leithead <
> travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> And now, I've got all the data for mine and Arron's rows in the table as
>> part of: https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/114
>>
>> :)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 3:31 PM
>> To: tink@tink.uk; public-html@w3.org
>> Subject: RE: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report
>>
>> FYI: PR to fix the tables a bit before starting into the report...
>> https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/112.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 8:44 AM
>> To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>; public-html@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report
>>
>> Thanks Travis. If you could give Arron a gentle nudge too, that'd be
>> appreciated.
>>
>>
>> On 05/09/2017 15:27, Travis Leithead wrote:
>> > Ah, thanks for the reminder; yes I'll do the same.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 2:20 AM
>> > To: public-html@w3.org
>> > Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report
>> >
>> > Arron and Travis,
>> >
>> > We discussed this on the HTML call today. Everyone is going to make a
>> concerted effort to complete this within the next week. Can you do the
>> same? Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 23/08/2017 16:20, Léonie Watson wrote:
>> >> Editors,
>> >>
>> >> I've updated the draft implementation report:
>> >> https://w3c.github.io/test-results/html52/implementation-report.html
>> >>
>> >> It now includes all the updates noted in the Changes section of the
>> spec:
>> >> https://w3.org/tr/html52/changes/
>> >>
>> >> Note: it may be the case that some of these can be removed from the
>> >> implementation report because they do not affect interop.
>> >>
>> >> Please can you fill in the interop information for the commits you
>> >> made (I've added names throughout the draft). Where the person who
>> >> submitted the PR is not a WG member, I've used the name of the editor
>> >> that approved the merge.
>> >>
>> >> The draft implementation report also includes features that have been
>> >> removed, or which may be removed based on the things marked "at risk"
>> >> during CR:
>> >> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/969
>> >>
>> >> With the exception of the plugin API, these are all features we
>> >> pulled from 5.1 in the hope that interop might have improved by now.
>> >> If you can help by verifying any/all of these again, that would be
>> welcome.
>> >>
>> >> We're tracking progress on the implementation report in this issue:
>> >> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/990
>> >>
>> >> The implementation report needs to be completed by Friday 8th
>> September.
>> >> We'll then be able to open the CFC on transitioning the spec to PR
>> >> the following week.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
>> >
>>
>> --
>> @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
>>
>
>