W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2017

RE: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report

From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 22:01:23 +0000
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "tink@tink.uk" <tink@tink.uk>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CY4PR21MB018302CE4BE326D8437FC1D6F8940@CY4PR21MB0183.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Thank you! 

And now, I've got all the data for mine and Arron's rows in the table as part of: https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/114


:)

-----Original Message-----
From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 3:31 PM
To: tink@tink.uk; public-html@w3.org
Subject: RE: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report

FYI: PR to fix the tables a bit before starting into the report... https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/112.


-----Original Message-----
From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 8:44 AM
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>; public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report

Thanks Travis. If you could give Arron a gentle nudge too, that'd be appreciated.


On 05/09/2017 15:27, Travis Leithead wrote:
> Ah, thanks for the reminder; yes I'll do the same.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 2:20 AM
> To: public-html@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report
> 
> Arron and Travis,
> 
> We discussed this on the HTML call today. Everyone is going to make a concerted effort to complete this within the next week. Can you do the same? Thanks.
> 
> 
> On 23/08/2017 16:20, Léonie Watson wrote:
>> Editors,
>>
>> I've updated the draft implementation report:
>> https://w3c.github.io/test-results/html52/implementation-report.html

>>
>> It now includes all the updates noted in the Changes section of the spec:
>> https://w3.org/tr/html52/changes/

>>
>> Note: it may be the case that some of these can be removed from the 
>> implementation report because they do not affect interop.
>>
>> Please can you fill in the interop information for the commits you 
>> made (I've added names throughout the draft). Where the person who 
>> submitted the PR is not a WG member, I've used the name of the editor 
>> that approved the merge.
>>
>> The draft implementation report also includes features that have been 
>> removed, or which may be removed based on the things marked "at risk"
>> during CR:
>> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/969

>>
>> With the exception of the plugin API, these are all features we 
>> pulled from 5.1 in the hope that interop might have improved by now. 
>> If you can help by verifying any/all of these again, that would be welcome.
>>
>> We're tracking progress on the implementation report in this issue:
>> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/990

>>
>> The implementation report needs to be completed by Friday 8th September.
>> We'll then be able to open the CFC on transitioning the spec to PR 
>> the following week.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> 
> --
> @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
> 

--
@LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 22:01:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 7 September 2017 22:01:55 UTC