- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:31:07 +0000
- To: "tink@tink.uk" <tink@tink.uk>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
FYI: PR to fix the tables a bit before starting into the report... https://github.com/w3c/test-results/pull/112. -----Original Message----- From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 8:44 AM To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>; public-html@w3.org Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report Thanks Travis. If you could give Arron a gentle nudge too, that'd be appreciated. On 05/09/2017 15:27, Travis Leithead wrote: > Ah, thanks for the reminder; yes I'll do the same. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 2:20 AM > To: public-html@w3.org > Subject: Re: Completing the HTML5.2 implementation report > > Arron and Travis, > > We discussed this on the HTML call today. Everyone is going to make a concerted effort to complete this within the next week. Can you do the same? Thanks. > > > On 23/08/2017 16:20, Léonie Watson wrote: >> Editors, >> >> I've updated the draft implementation report: >> https://w3c.github.io/test-results/html52/implementation-report.html >> >> It now includes all the updates noted in the Changes section of the spec: >> https://w3.org/tr/html52/changes/ >> >> Note: it may be the case that some of these can be removed from the >> implementation report because they do not affect interop. >> >> Please can you fill in the interop information for the commits you >> made (I've added names throughout the draft). Where the person who >> submitted the PR is not a WG member, I've used the name of the editor >> that approved the merge. >> >> The draft implementation report also includes features that have been >> removed, or which may be removed based on the things marked "at risk" >> during CR: >> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/969 >> >> With the exception of the plugin API, these are all features we pulled >> from 5.1 in the hope that interop might have improved by now. If you >> can help by verifying any/all of these again, that would be welcome. >> >> We're tracking progress on the implementation report in this issue: >> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/990 >> >> The implementation report needs to be completed by Friday 8th September. >> We'll then be able to open the CFC on transitioning the spec to PR the >> following week. >> >> Thanks. >> > > -- > @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem > -- @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2017 22:31:31 UTC