W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2015

Re: aria-describedat

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:00:47 -0700
Cc: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "Gunderson, Jon R" <jongund@illinois.edu>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, LĂ©onie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>, Markus Gylling <markus.gylling@gmail.com>, "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, W3C PF - DPUB Joint Task Force <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <7E193948-292A-441E-AFA7-F46F460BAA14@apple.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>

> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:59 , Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
> + I think that if details/summary is a useful pattern for the use cases it makes a good case for getting it implemented in browsers that don't currently support it.

It certainly seems that proposing something that is neither currently specified nor implemented (describedat), as an alternative for something that is specified but not yet completely implemented (details/summary), is strange at best. :-(

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:01:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:46 UTC