- From: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:24:07 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 5:30 AM > > On 27/01/2014 10:00, Steve Faulkner wrote: > > <a href="http://w3.org"> > > <img src="images/w3c_home.png" width="72" height="48"*alt="W3C > web site"*> > > </a> > > > > the bug reporter is suggesting that because the image is a logo this > > information should be included in the text. > > > > My thinking is that as the primary purpose of the image in the context > > it is being used is as link content, the alt text should be a brief > > description of the link target only. > > I'd agree with this. True, there may well be situations in which a user that > can't perceive the image would like to know that it is, in fact, a logo - but this > is, in my opinion, an edge case at best, as I would posit that the majority of > users will be interested in the purpose of the image (acting as a link), rather > than the nature of the image. I don't think so much that it is important to note that it is a logo as it relates to nature of the image (branding) and its purpose on the page (branding, link). IMO, a better @alt would encapsulate both: "W3C site: link home" or "Go to W3C site home page." This way it retains both branding and link purpose/destination. Of course, if the image is stored in a CMS with its @alt and is used somewhere other than a link home, then that @alt would be confusing. I do not (off the top of my head) know of a CMS that does this, however.
Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 16:24:35 UTC