- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:36:08 +1100
- To: Brendan Long <self@brendanlong.com>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Brendan, First things first: Why are you writing another spec to translate CEA-708 to WebVTT when the TextTrack CG already has this document: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/text-tracks/raw-file/default/608toVTT/608toVTT.html ? Also, the link that you provided links to a document to translate in-band MPEG-2 text tracks to HTML5 text tracks and thus has nothing to do with WebVTT - I am very confused. Now for some inline comments. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Brendan Long <self@brendanlong.com> wrote: > My company is working on a spec to translate CEA-708 captions to WebVTT, and > one issue we're running into is it's not always obvious how long a > particular caption should be displayed. This blog post says that there has > been discussion to add a "NEXT" end time for WebVTT, meaning "until the next > cue", which would also be useful for us. I don't remember seeing this > discussed on the mailing list though, so I'm wondering if you're still > planning to add this. Yes, it's still an option and there is a bug in the bug tracker for it and it needs more discussion. This discussion needs to be had also on the TextTrack CG mailing list. > If so, how will it be represented? TextTrackCue.endTime is currently a > "double". One option would be making it nullable and making null mean "until > the next cue". Making endTime a string would make the type more complicated, > but would let us use "NEXT". We had also considered using infinity, but I > suspect null or "NEXT" would be less confusing. Interesting idea. That may indeed be a nicer possibility. Feel free to get involved in any of the following bug discussions: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23414 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18029 / https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14104 Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2014 01:36:55 UTC