- From: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:20:57 -0500
- To: Julie Jeongeun Kim <je00julie.kim@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Marco Zehe <mzehe@mozilla.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@chromium.org>, David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>
- Message-ID: <CA+epNsfDet70SMimKZCM-Do3av1BcHGrQDr1qoNgTL9PuPqTEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Ok, good. Please let me know if it can be improved in some way. Thanks. Alexander. On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Julie Jeongeun Kim <je00julie.kim@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > At first time, when you gave me that description, > I thought the both conditions are at the same level and I couldn't > understand what caused to assign different role to case 4 and case 6. > Now I can see what you mean. > The first line is the first condition and then the second sentence is the > second condition. > Thanks for helping me understand. > > I think Firefox has a reasonable solution and appreciate that I can refer > to that. > > Thanks, > Julie > > 2014-12-30 0:30 GMT+09:00 Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>: > >> Hi, Julie. Is your wording different from the wording I gave for current >> Firefox algorithm? It was: >> >> * if header is preceded by header cells then it's a column header, if it >> is preceded by cells then it's a row header >> * if header is followed by header cells then it's a column header, if it >> is followed by cells then it's a row header >> >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Julie Jeongeun Kim < >> je00julie.kim@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alexsander, >>> Sorry for causing confusion. >>> Here is correction. >>> >>> First we can check the previous cell. >>> * if header is preceded by header cells then it's a column header, >>> if it is preceded by cells then it's a row header >>> We can cover cases except case 1), case 4), case 5) and case 7) because >>> they have header cells at row index 0. >>> >>> And then, >>> * if header has no previous cell (row index is 0) then we can check the >>> next cell. >>> if header is followed by header cells then it's a column header, >>> if it is followed by cells then it's a row header >>> We can cover case 1,4,5 and 7 without breaking others. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> 2014-12-29 23:50 GMT+09:00 Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> >>> : >>> >>>> Hi, Julie. I'm confused by terms. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Julie Jeongeun Kim < >>>> je00julie.kim@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Alexander, >>>>> >>>>> First we can check the previous cell. >>>>> * if header is followed by header cells then it's a column header, >>>>> >>>> >>>> did you mean "preceded" rather than "followed" here? >>>> >>>> >>>>> if it is followed by cells then it's a row header >>>>> We can cover cases except case 4), case 5) and case 7) because they >>>>> have header cells at row index 0. >>>>> >>>>> And then, >>>>> * if header has no previous cell (row index is 0) then we can check >>>>> the next cell. >>>>> if header is preceded by header cells then it's a column header, >>>>> if it is preceded by cells then it's a row header >>>>> >>>>> We can cover case 4,5 and 7 without breaking others. >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> 2014-12-24 23:33 GMT+09:00 Alexander Surkov < >>>>> surkov.alexander@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, Julie. That was just an algorithm, it's not necessary perfect, >>>>>> and probably wasn't even designed keeping in mind edge cases. I think we >>>>>> should do what's reasonable. What do you think we should do for case 6? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Julie Jeongeun Kim < >>>>>> je00julie.kim@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your detail description. >>>>>>> Your description covers generally all cases. >>>>>>> But I'm not clear about the case 4 and the case 6. >>>>>>> The case 4 and the case 6 are similar. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Case 4) >>>>>>> The first th is column header role because it is preceded by header >>>>>>> cell as you described. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Case 6) >>>>>>> The first th is row header role even though it is preceded by header >>>>>>> cell. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did I miss something? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Julie >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-12-19 1:05 GMT+09:00 Alexander Surkov < >>>>>>> surkov.alexander@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sure :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer < >>>>>>>> clown@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2014-12-18 9:15 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Here's correction. >>>>>>>>>> * if header is preceded by header cells then it's a column >>>>>>>>>> header, if it is preceded by cells then it's a raw header >>>>>>>>>> * if header is followed by header cells then it's a column >>>>>>>>>> header, if it is followed by cells then it's a raw header >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You mean "row" header, not "raw" header, right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> ;;;;joseph. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 'Array(16).join("wat" - 1) + " Batman!"' >>>>>>>>> - G. Bernhardt - >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2014 14:21:27 UTC