- From: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:30:26 -0500
- To: Julie Jeongeun Kim <je00julie.kim@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Marco Zehe <mzehe@mozilla.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@chromium.org>, David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>
- Message-ID: <CA+epNsf3Jg0y2_3Nmr8OLzu0g9R1DyZe16fn_KCYVryxKdWByw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Julie. Is your wording different from the wording I gave for current Firefox algorithm? It was: * if header is preceded by header cells then it's a column header, if it is preceded by cells then it's a row header * if header is followed by header cells then it's a column header, if it is followed by cells then it's a row header On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Julie Jeongeun Kim < je00julie.kim@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alexsander, > Sorry for causing confusion. > Here is correction. > > First we can check the previous cell. > * if header is preceded by header cells then it's a column header, > if it is preceded by cells then it's a row header > We can cover cases except case 1), case 4), case 5) and case 7) because > they have header cells at row index 0. > > And then, > * if header has no previous cell (row index is 0) then we can check the > next cell. > if header is followed by header cells then it's a column header, > if it is followed by cells then it's a row header > We can cover case 1,4,5 and 7 without breaking others. > > What do you think? > > 2014-12-29 23:50 GMT+09:00 Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>: > >> Hi, Julie. I'm confused by terms. >> >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Julie Jeongeun Kim < >> je00julie.kim@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alexander, >>> >>> First we can check the previous cell. >>> * if header is followed by header cells then it's a column header, >>> >> >> did you mean "preceded" rather than "followed" here? >> >> >>> if it is followed by cells then it's a row header >>> We can cover cases except case 4), case 5) and case 7) because they have >>> header cells at row index 0. >>> >>> And then, >>> * if header has no previous cell (row index is 0) then we can check the >>> next cell. >>> if header is preceded by header cells then it's a column header, >>> if it is preceded by cells then it's a row header >>> >>> We can cover case 4,5 and 7 without breaking others. >>> What do you think? >>> >>> 2014-12-24 23:33 GMT+09:00 Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> >>> : >>> >>>> Hi, Julie. That was just an algorithm, it's not necessary perfect, and >>>> probably wasn't even designed keeping in mind edge cases. I think we should >>>> do what's reasonable. What do you think we should do for case 6? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Julie Jeongeun Kim < >>>> je00julie.kim@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for your detail description. >>>>> Your description covers generally all cases. >>>>> But I'm not clear about the case 4 and the case 6. >>>>> The case 4 and the case 6 are similar. >>>>> >>>>> Case 4) >>>>> The first th is column header role because it is preceded by header >>>>> cell as you described. >>>>> >>>>> Case 6) >>>>> The first th is row header role even though it is preceded by header >>>>> cell. >>>>> >>>>> Did I miss something? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Julie >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2014-12-19 1:05 GMT+09:00 Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com >>>>> >: >>>>>> >>>>>> sure :) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer < >>>>>> clown@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2014-12-18 9:15 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's correction. >>>>>>>> * if header is preceded by header cells then it's a column header, >>>>>>>> if it is preceded by cells then it's a raw header >>>>>>>> * if header is followed by header cells then it's a column header, >>>>>>>> if it is followed by cells then it's a raw header >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You mean "row" header, not "raw" header, right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ;;;;joseph. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 'Array(16).join("wat" - 1) + " Batman!"' >>>>>>> - G. Bernhardt - >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Monday, 29 December 2014 15:31:01 UTC