- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:42:34 +0100
- To: "Frederico Knabben" <f.knabben@cksource.com>
- Cc: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "Tobie Langel" <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, "Ben Peters" <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>, public-editing-tf <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:02:25 +0100, Frederico Knabben <f.knabben@cksource.com> wrote: > On Friday, 12 December 2014 at 14:40, Simon Pieters wrote: >> How about "device-independent events"? > Aren’t we missing what kinds of events we’re talking about? We would > just know that those events are device-independent. > > So far we’ve been talking about “input” events. If this is still the > case, this should be clear. > > Option 1: You agree that because we’re talking about “device”, “input” > is an implicit information. I’m unsure. I think this is generally understood. You wouldn't refer to e.g. the 'load' event as a device-independent event even though it technically is. > Option 2: Device-Independent Input Events (dii-events then). > > Option 3: We’re talking about a totally new group of events, which don’t > include only input, but everything that is “device-independent”. Then > use cases should be listed. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Saturday, 13 December 2014 07:43:07 UTC