W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2014

Re: [editing] Responsive Input Terminology

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:42:34 +0100
To: "Frederico Knabben" <f.knabben@cksource.com>
Cc: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "Tobie Langel" <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, "Ben Peters" <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>, public-editing-tf <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xqsqc8hhidj3kv@simons-mbp>
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:02:25 +0100, Frederico Knabben  
<f.knabben@cksource.com> wrote:

> On Friday, 12 December 2014 at 14:40, Simon Pieters wrote:
>> How about "device-independent events"?
> Aren’t we missing what kinds of events we’re talking about? We would  
> just know that those events are device-independent.
>
> So far we’ve been talking about “input” events. If this is still the  
> case, this should be clear.
>
> Option 1: You agree that because we’re talking about “device”, “input”  
> is an implicit information. I’m unsure.

I think this is generally understood. You wouldn't refer to e.g. the  
'load' event as a device-independent event even though it technically is.

> Option 2: Device-Independent Input Events (dii-events then).
>
> Option 3: We’re talking about a totally new group of events, which don’t  
> include only input, but everything that is “device-independent”. Then  
> use cases should be listed.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Saturday, 13 December 2014 07:43:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:46:11 UTC