W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Conformance requirements on browsers

From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:53:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJK2wqWtOPk3hBUG8zDZCnT-UJ9A3LbTMtyz9RHmWquyqRBrxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>, W3C Public HTML <public-html@w3.org>
*pats self on back for that brilliant little bit of spec-wrangling*  :)


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:02:22 +0200, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Which browser dropped support for "text-decoration: blink"?  I don't know
>>> of
>>> any.
>>>
>>
>> Didnít WebKit, effectively?
>> <http://hell.meiert.org/core/**html/text-decoration.html<http://hell.meiert.org/core/html/text-decoration.html>
>> >.
>>
>
> Read the message you replied to again. :-)
>
> There is a difference between supporting the keyword (but making it not
> blink) and not supporting the keyword (which would cause the declaration to
> be dropped). Browsers haven't dropped support, they just stopped blinking,
> which is conforming per the CSS spec.
>
>
> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software
>
>
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 15:54:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:46:05 UTC