In some languages (also in English I'm pretty sure) ellipsis in the text means you've skipped a part of the original text, so I don't think that would be a good rendering method. Again I want to stress that a 'note' has a significantly different meaning than a 'highlight', although in this case they seem to enter a grey area. On 8 September 2013 14:18, Leif Halvard Silli < xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > Leif Halvard Silli, Sun, 8 Sep 2013 19:50:23 +0200: > > Yes, notes, including <cite> and <footer> - which - is my idea - would > > have to be place inside a <note> element in order to be conforming (or > > at least: may be it should be conforming to not place it in <note>, but > > only <note> would reliably separate it from the original text). The > > <note> element should be possible to use multiple times within the same > > quote, and it should have content model similar to <ins> and <del> > > (namely, either inline or block, depending on how one uses it). > > And may be, when a boolean @ellipsis attribute is present, a <note > ellipsis></note> should have “… …” as (generated) content. > > Thus this: > > <blockquote> > Yes, notes, including <cite> and <footer> <note ellipsis></note> > would > </blockquote> > > Would be rendered like so: > > Yes, notes, including <cite> and <footer> … … would > > And so, if someone adds the word “snip“ as content of <note ellipsis>, > this would result in this: > > Yes, notes, including <cite> and <footer> … snip … would > -- > leif halvard silli >
Received on Sunday, 8 September 2013 18:28:27 UTC