- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:14:14 +0100
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 22/05/2013 12:10, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > 'reduced prominence' could probably work. > > But with respect to what Ian said about ’often more important’, may be > ’suppressed prominence’ could also work? The word ’suppressed’ could > also be meaningful with regard to the fact that small text in headings > can be suppressed from the outline. THus: > > ’The small element represents content with _suppressed_ prominence such > as small print.’ Perhaps even making it passive, to show that it's not the content itself that is less prominent/important, but that it has been MADE to be so by author choice? Or am I getting too meta again? 'The small element represents content whose prominence has been [reduced|suppressed], such as small print.' P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 11:14:44 UTC