- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:03:18 -0700
- To: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 22:04:10 UTC
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>wrote: > Glenn Adams: > > On the other hand, if Google were to grant a sub-license to the W3C and > the > > Web Community that meets the W3C PP, then that might be sufficient cause > to > > re-open this issue. > > "The arrangement with MPEG LA and 11 patent owners grants a license to > Google and allows Google to sublicense any techniques that may be > essential to VP8 and are owned by the patent owners; we may sublicense > those techniques to any VP8 user on a royalty-free basis. The techniques > may be used in any VP8 product, whether developed by Google or a third > party or based on Google's libvpx implementation or a third-party > implementation of the VP8 data format specification. It further provides > for sublicensing those VP8 techniques in one successor generation to the > VP8 video codec. > > We anticipate having the terms of our sublicense ready in the next few > weeks. When those terms are ready we will blog about them here, so watch > this space." > http://blog.webmproject.org/2013/03/vp8-and-mpeg-la.html who is "we"? > (But we still need to protect the open web against DRM ;-) > no we don't (please take your crusade elsewhere, as this ML is not an appropriate forum)
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 22:04:10 UTC