- From: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:36:36 +0000
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- CC: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Leif Halvard Silli [mailto:xn--mlform-iua@målform.no] > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 10:59 AM > > Adrian Roselli, Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:19:43 +0000: > > If a sub-heading element is created, then this language should change > > to reflect that. > > Thus, it seems we just complicate the issue if we try to say anything about > <small> vs sub-headings, before we have come to a conclusion regarding a > sub-heading element solution. In my opinion, not at all. Explicitly forbidding <small> seems unnecessary to me. Just strike that prohibition and move on. That has no bearing on whether or not a <subline>-like element comes in the future. If a <subline>-like element does come in the future, then the language can be amended.
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 15:37:03 UTC