- From: Ian Devlin <ian@iandevlin.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 17:21:25 +0200
- To: Samuel Santos <samaxes@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOYOhSvca3CK75_rFfc6ucB1Kov3L6pyBjFYXn_mu7cn9hXhVA@mail.gmail.com>
Bootstrap suggests a number of things that are wrong (e.g. using <i> for icons!) so I wouldn't use that as a reason to keep it. On 7 June 2013 16:45, Samuel Santos <samaxes@gmail.com> wrote: > Lets not forget that a lot of sites already use <small> for sub-headings. > Frameworks like Bootstrap suggest exactly that<http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/components.html#typography> > : > > <h1>Example page header <small>Subtext for header</small></h1> > > > > -- > Samuel Santos > http://www.samaxes.com/ > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Adrian Roselli < > Roselli@algonquinstudios.com> wrote: > >> > From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 5:06 AM >> > >> > Hi all, >> > hixie made a change to the whatwg spec in regards to <small>[1] >> > >> > <p>The <code>small</code> element must not be used for subheadings; for >> that purpose, use the >> > <code>hgroup</code> element.</p> >> > >> > As you may know changes to the whatwg spec are treated as proposals for >> inclusion in the HTML spec, >> > many are included as they are uncontroversial. >> > >> > Some like the above are not, as the WG needs to be made aware and >> discussion needs to take place >> > on the change. >> > >> > The second part of the sentence can be replaced with "follow the advice >> on marking up Subheadings, >> > subtitles, alternative titles and taglines [2]" >> > >> > but we need to decide if the "must not" requirement on use of <small> >> is an appropriate conformance >> > requirement for HTML? >> >> I don't think it should be "must not." There is no element for >> subheadings, so excluding one over others seems capricious. >> >> We (or maybe just me) can make the same argument that an <em> is not a >> subheading. Nor is an <i>. In each case, since there is no >> semantic/structural element to indicate a sub-head, a developer is going to >> choose an element that approximates a desired visual style. Sometimes the >> developer might want to make it smaller (<small>), sometimes italic (<i>), >> sometimes both (maybe both elements, maybe just one with more styles). >> >> If a sub-heading element is created, then this language should change to >> reflect that. >> >> FWIW, I don't think any of those elements makes a good sub-head. >> >> >> > [1] http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7869&to=7870 >> > [2] >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/common-idioms.html#sub-head >> >> >
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 15:21:55 UTC