- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 17:32:07 +0100
- To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VnVhR3RkHpptp-nh60hEJveDcm4+VLr3eK3S56r_zTCdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jukka, The WHATWG definition for <small> is "side comments such as small print", > which is very vague and almost sounds like what <small> has always meant > in HTML and will always mean, whatever specs might say: smaller font size. > But WHATWG defines the element so cryptically that we could spend the rest > of our lives discussing it without ever really agreeing, or understanding > each other. > > In any case, WHATWG seems to be saying that <small> is *not* for > de-emphasis. > So as an author, you would violate the rules > if you were writing the definition of <small> what would it be? -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 7 June 2013 11:36, Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi> wrote: > 2013-06-07 12:48, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > > What if, as an author, I *do* want to mark my subheading with <small> >> > > because I believe that part of the heading should be naturally > > de-emphasised? > > The WHATWG definition for <small> is "side comments such as small print", > which is very vague and almost sounds like what <small> has always meant > in HTML and will always mean, whatever specs might say: smaller font size. > But WHATWG defines the element so cryptically that we could spend the rest > of our lives discussing it without ever really agreeing, or understanding > each other. > > In any case, WHATWG seems to be saying that <small> is *not* for > de-emphasis. > So as an author, you would violate the rules > > > > What if it was mandated that you "must not" use <small> for > > subheadings...is there any reliable programmatic way to flag that up > > as a validation error? > > Of course not. It could not be done even using the most advanced > artificial intelligence > we can imagine, because the definition is vague and subjective. If there > are no > objective criteria for being a subheading (in the logical sense), there > cannot be > any objective analysis of such rules. > > Using <small> inside a heading element should be encouraged, not forbidden. > In situations where one cannot rely on style sheets, it is the only way to > give part > of a heading smaller font size, which in turn may be essential for > conveying > the message of a heading properly. Whether you call such a part a > subheading or > just a less important part or something else is up to you > > -- > Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~**jkorpela/ <http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/> > > >
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 16:33:15 UTC