- From: Samuel Santos <samaxes@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:45:29 +0100
- To: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL3Vm+iBvB-vBhOk0JTZd5gWX6n0YUYTavB2DQVYxhHUNxp7qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Lets not forget that a lot of sites already use <small> for sub-headings. Frameworks like Bootstrap suggest exactly that<http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/components.html#typography> : <h1>Example page header <small>Subtext for header</small></h1> -- Samuel Santos http://www.samaxes.com/ On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com > wrote: > > From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 5:06 AM > > > > Hi all, > > hixie made a change to the whatwg spec in regards to <small>[1] > > > > <p>The <code>small</code> element must not be used for subheadings; for > that purpose, use the > > <code>hgroup</code> element.</p> > > > > As you may know changes to the whatwg spec are treated as proposals for > inclusion in the HTML spec, > > many are included as they are uncontroversial. > > > > Some like the above are not, as the WG needs to be made aware and > discussion needs to take place > > on the change. > > > > The second part of the sentence can be replaced with "follow the advice > on marking up Subheadings, > > subtitles, alternative titles and taglines [2]" > > > > but we need to decide if the "must not" requirement on use of <small> is > an appropriate conformance > > requirement for HTML? > > I don't think it should be "must not." There is no element for > subheadings, so excluding one over others seems capricious. > > We (or maybe just me) can make the same argument that an <em> is not a > subheading. Nor is an <i>. In each case, since there is no > semantic/structural element to indicate a sub-head, a developer is going to > choose an element that approximates a desired visual style. Sometimes the > developer might want to make it smaller (<small>), sometimes italic (<i>), > sometimes both (maybe both elements, maybe just one with more styles). > > If a sub-heading element is created, then this language should change to > reflect that. > > FWIW, I don't think any of those elements makes a good sub-head. > > > > [1] http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7869&to=7870 > > [2] > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/common-idioms.html#sub-head > >
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 14:46:17 UTC